Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ferrantino Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$507kEducation$311kPhilanthropy$270kHuman Services$48kYouth Development$26kAnimals$16kReligion$6kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$66,667
DYNAMI FOUNDATION$25,100
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
DEARBORN GOODFELLOWS$5,000
CHADTOUGH$5,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS' HOSPITAL$5,000
MOJO IN THE MORNING$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN$5,000
GRIEVE WELL$1,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION$1,000
FIRST STEP$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR FOUNDATION$1,000
EMERSON SCHOOL$1,000
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY$1,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COURAGE WORLDWIDE: $100 → 6%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $2k → 10%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $100 → 26%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%CHADTOUGH: $5k → 14%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%HOCKEY HAS HEART: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
PA
CT
CA
KY
VA
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$542k · 38 repeat orgs$598k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
38

Total granted

$542k
$591k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+25%

Still filing today

71%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    7× · 2018–2024 · $182k · revenue +195%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +55%
  • MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $300k
  • UD
    UBS DONOR-ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $177k
  • TH
    TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGANgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
2
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
3
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
4
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
7
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

8
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
9
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan

We honor life through donation.

12
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Dynami Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterIndependent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr18%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%9%5–10yr20%46%10–20yr15%15%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr18%4%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/55
the rest of the field
12%
6,510/53,801

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/52
Grantees still filing
40/52
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Michigan — $181,671 · OtherUniversity of MichiganUBS DONOR-ADVISED FUND — $177,311 · OtherUBS DONOR-ADVISED FUNDST JUDE'S CHILDRENS' HOSPITAL — $40,000 · Other+41 more — $107,800 · Other+41 moreDYNAMI FOUNDATION — $78,300 · HealthDYNAMI FOUNDATIONBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $75,000 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDAT…TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $50,000 · HealthTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIG…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $42,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION …+7 more — $6,900 · HealthDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $66,426 · PhilanthropyTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyHOCKEY HAS HEART — $10,000 · Human ServicesPaws With A Cause — $6,500 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 · Human Services+5 more — $1,600 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $7,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS FOR ANIMALS OF METRO DETROIT — $3,500 · AnimalsDETROIT DOG RESCUE — $3,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY — $1,500 · Animals+3 more — $1,200 · AnimalsCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $8,192 · EducationEMERSON SCHOOL INC — $2,000 · EducationGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $1,800 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $1,500 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $200 · Food & Nutrition
Other$806,782Health$252,700Philanthropy$92,426Human Services$24,100Animals$16,200Education$10,192Food & Nutrition$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan — $181,671 over 7y, 16% of budgetDYNAMI FOUNDATION — $78,300 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $66,426 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $42,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEARBORN GOODFELLOWS INC — $16,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetHOCKEY HAS HEART — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $8,192 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPaws With A Cause — $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRIEVEWELL — $5,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS FOR ANIMALS OF METRO DETROIT — $3,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT DOG RESCUE — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMERSON SCHOOL INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VICTORIA PROJECT INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Social Services of Washtenaw County — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FUND OF MICHIGAN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARLEY'S MUTTS DOG RESCUE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUTTS WITH A MISSION — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAIM AT MELANOMA — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumble Design Inc — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA MARIA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds DYNAMI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DEARBORN GOODFELLOWS INC
  • Who funds HOCKEY HAS HEART
  • Who funds COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause
  • Who funds GRIEVEWELL
  • Who funds CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR ANIMALS OF METRO DETROIT
  • Who funds DETROIT DOG RESCUE
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EMERSON SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY
  • Who funds THE VICTORIA PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · J Ferrantino Charitable Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Dte Energy Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ferrantino Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ferrantino Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ferrantino Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph