· Public charity
Feed More Inc
Feedmore's mission is to fight hunger in central virginia.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 29 grants below total $374,116 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $74,261,678 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $73,887,562 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $117k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $257k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WAYMAKERS FOUNDATION | $45,500 |
| THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC | $33,600 |
| REACHING BEYOND THE WALLS RVA | $30,000 |
| ATLANTIC OUTREACH GROUP INC | $28,733 |
| FACES FOOD PANTRY | $26,500 |
| COUNTYLINE BAPTIST CHURCH FOOD MINISTRY | $25,100 |
| BELMONT COMMUNITY RESOURCE SVCS | $18,300 |
| RESTORATION FELL CHRISTIAN CTR | $18,000 |
| WALNUT HILL PHARMACY | $11,000 |
| ST THOMAS' EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $10,500 |
| CORINTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH (SANDSTON FOOD PANTRY) | $10,000 |
| MUTUAL AID DISASTER RELIEF RICHMOND | $9,700 |
| SOUTH HILL BREAD BOX | $7,000 |
| ST ANN CATHOLIC CHURCH (OUR DAILY BREAD) | $7,000 |
| COMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICES | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Feed More Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 93% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC7× · 2017–2025 · $803k · revenue +42%
- WFWAYMAKERS FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2025 · $137k · revenue +144%
- CHCOLONIAL HEIGHTS FOOD PANTRY INC5× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- WOWHITE OAK FORK BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $56k
- PCPEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER INC3× · 2018–2024 · $40k
- THTHE HEIGHTS CHURCH INCone grant, 2024 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide food to the needy residents of Dickenson County Virginia
Jesus commanded, "love your neighbor as yourself." (mark 12:31) our ministry provides loving service to the poor and hungry. the organization will operate an ecumenical food pantry to serve those who need food assistance in york county and…
To provide for the economically disadvantaged people in the community.
Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.
Our program is designed to help give back to the Southern Virginia community. We have weekly programs in place geared towards youth, young adults, families and senior citizens. We reach these individuals through feeding and group meetings…
Food distribution to the needy
Reduce hunger and provide food to families in need.
Religious Orginazation
Local food pantry serving those food insecurity.
UGK Community First provides a consistent source of nutritious and healthy chef prepared meals to food insecure families who live in underserved communities as well as those who find themselves in food insecure situations due to…
Food Security
Food bank, community resource center
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Harvest Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mutual Aid Disaster Relief Richmond. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Farmville Area Community Emergency Services Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds WAYMAKERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLONIAL HEIGHTS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CHESTERFIELD FOOD BANK OUTREACH CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds GoochlandCares ↗
- Who funds BELMONT COMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Louisa County Resource Council of Louisa Virginia ↗
- Who funds Cumberland Community Cares ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEALING PLACE ↗
- Who funds TOTAL LIFE CENTER OF SOUTHSIDE VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds MOMENTS OF HOPE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds REACHING BEYOND THE WALLS RVA ↗
- Who funds The Humanities Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PROMISE LAND PASTURES ↗
- Who funds CARITAS ↗
- Who funds ATLANTIC OUTREACH GROUP ↗
- Who funds HANDUP COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · The Titmus Foundation · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg · Robins Foundation · The Cameron Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Feed More Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.