How much does Federico Mg Charitable Fdn give?

Federico Mg Charitable Fdn reported 4 grants totaling $42,863 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 12 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.

What does Federico Mg Charitable Fdn fund?

By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (87%), Health (5%), Human Services (4%).

Who are Federico Mg Charitable Fdn's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Bunnies Urgently Needing Shelter ($57k), Santa Barbara Wildlife Care Network ($40k), Woods Humane Society Inc ($32k).

Does Federico Mg Charitable Fdn fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Federico Mg Charitable Fdn accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Federico Mg Charitable Fdn?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Santa Barbara Foundation, Patricia Bragg Foundation, Bragg Health Foundation.

Where is Federico Mg Charitable Fdn based?

Federico Mg Charitable Fdn is based in MN.

Federico Mg Charitable Fdn

Federico Mg Charitable Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Federico Mg Charitable Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$17k

Largest

01What it funds

0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$230kHealth$14kHuman Services$10kOther$0

02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $15k
$10k–50k2 grants · $28k

$11,363

Median grant

States reached

$767k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
BUNNIES URGENTLY NEEDING SHELTER	$16,500
SANTA BARBARA WILDLIFE CARE NETWORK	$11,363
WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY	$7,500
LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM	$7,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$257k · 10 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +112% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$257k

$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+112%

+48%

Still filing today

70%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsHuman ServicesOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BU
BUNNIES URGENTLY NEEDING SHELTER
7× · 2019–2025 · $57k · revenue +182%
SB
SANTA BARBARA WILDLIFE CARE NETWORK
7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +351%
WH
WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC
7× · 2019–2025 · $32k · revenue +61%

Funded once

RT
RETURN TO FREEDOM INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +46%
SB
SANTA BARBARA EQUINE ASSISTANCE AND EVACUATION TEAMgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +58%
D
DAWG
one grant, 2019 · $2k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals

Sunset Farms Sanctuary

We provide shelter food and vet care for abandoned abused and neglected animals

Animals

Paws and Claws Animal Shelter

Animals

Hope Ranch Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue

Animals

Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—

Boardwalk Pet Rescue

Pet rescue

Animals

Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals

California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

—

2 the Rescue Animal Sanctuary Inc

Four million animals are euthanized every year in California alone, and 2 the Rescue Animal Sanctuary is here to lower that number. Our Sanctuary is dedicated to providing a safe haven for the unwanted animals scheduled for unecessary…

Animals

Grace Farm Animal Rescue and Sanctu

Animals

Sparky's Paradise Rescue Ranch

Pet rescue

—

Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live and Let Live Farm Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cold Noses Warm Hearts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

9/10

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Animals$182,050Other$73,400Human Services$10,359

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Patricia Bragg Foundation · Bragg Health Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Manitou Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Federico Mg Charitable Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Federico Mg Charitable Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Federico Mg Charitable Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home