Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fay Shwayder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.8MArts & Culture$257kCivil Rights$50kEducation$25kHealth$13kAnimals$13kEnvironment$11kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY$110,000
SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC$60,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FSTV$10,000
THE HORSE SHELTER$10,000
SILVER BULLET PRODUCTIONS$10,000
NM COUMMUNITY TRUST$5,000
HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANTUARY$2,500
MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$2,500
SITE SANTA FE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 6% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FOREVER NAVAJO FOUNDATION: $500 → 19%MAYO CLINIC: $10k → 9%CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $40k → 22%FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY: $110k → 14%BARNARD COLLEGE: $20k → 17%SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $60k → 12%NEW MEXICO PUBLIC BROADCAST: $500 → 14%HARA INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 10%NATIONAL JEWISH HOSPITAL: $3k → 12%LIVING ON EARTH: $5k → 9%MAYO CLNIC ORG CHALLENGE: $3k → 9%CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $25k → 22%SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10k → 12%SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10k → 12%SANTE FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10k → 12%SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $8k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $3k → 12%HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANTUARY: $3k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $3k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $3k → 12%MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $3k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $2k → 12%MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $426k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $300k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $103k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $90k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%THE HORSE SHELTER: $10k → 12%EARTH EDUCATION: $11k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN HOSPICE: $350 → 12%FOOD DEPOT LAS COMPANAS: $3k → 12%SILVER BULLET PRODUCTIONS: $10k → 12%PRO MUSICA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $300 → 12%KITCHEN ANGELS: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
NY
PA
CA
CO
AZ
NM
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 51% of Fay Shwayder Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Fay Shwayder Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$216k · 6 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$216k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
0%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD
    4× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +17%
  • CI
    CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +95%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • AN
    ACLU NEW MEXICO
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • BARNARD COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +48%
  • EE
    EARTH EDUCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Santa Fe Opera

To further the operatic art form by presenting ensemble performances of the highest quality in a varied repertoire of new as well as rarely performed and standard works, to ensure excellence of opera's future through its apprentice…

Arts & Culture
2
Santa Fe Institute

The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…

Science & Tech
3
Santa Fe Botanical Garden

The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…

Environment
4
Santa Fe Pro Musica Inc

Santa fe pro musica brings together outstanding musicians to inspire and educate audiences of all ages through the performance of great music.

Arts & Culture
5
San Francisco Conservatory of Music

The san francisco conservatory of music (sfcm) educates exceptionally talented musicians from around the world to become artists of the highest caliber, as well as musical citizens prepared for the challenges of the twenty-first century.

Education
6
The Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico
—
7
The Center for Contemporary Arts of Santa Fe Inc

Through a variety of media created by emerging and established artists, the center for contemporary arts of santa fe, inc. (center) presents the arts of our time as vital elements in the cultural dialogue in santa fe and throughout new…

Arts & Culture
8
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
9
Ojai Festivals Ltd

The ojai music festival serves as a creative music laboratory for pioneering new works,championing adventurous programming, and working with today's emerging artists with events during the year and the ojai music festival serves as a…

Arts & Culture
10
Ballet Arts Foundation

Ballet tucson is dedicated to bringing iconic, world-class dance performances and rising star artists to tucson and to sharing explorative experiences that inspire hope and excitement in our community.

Arts & Culture
11
New Mexico Philharmonic Inc

The new mexico philharmonic's mission is to enrich lives by providing excellent music, community engagement and educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
12
New Mexico School for the Arts - Arts Institute

New mexico school for the arts-art institute, assists passionate young artists in developing their full potential through a rigorous master of arts and academic education

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Earth Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,708,500 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $110,000 · PhilanthropySANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD: $90,000 · Arts & CultureCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $30,500 · Arts & CultureSITE SANTA FE: $19,850 · Arts & CultureSilver Bullet Productions: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureACLU NEW MEXICO: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherEARTH EDUCATION: $11,110 · OtherSANTE FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10,000 · OtherFSTV: $10,000 · OtherSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FE: $8,000 · OtherNM COUMMUNITY TRUST: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+11 more: $14,150 · OtherBARNARD COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationTHE HORSE SHELTER: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,500 · AnimalsMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 · Health
Philanthropy$2,818,500Arts & Culture$223,450Other$133,260Education$20,000Animals$12,500Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,708,500 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD: $90,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $30,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSITE SANTA FE: $19,850 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEARTH EDUCATION: $11,110 over 1y, 22% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA DESERT CHORALE: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD ↗
  • Who funds CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SITE SANTA FE ↗
  • Who funds EARTH EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE HORSE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Silver Bullet Productions ↗
  • Who funds LUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA DESERT CHORALE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fay Shwayder Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fay Shwayder Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fay Shwayder’s filings →

    More from the funding graph