Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fay Shwayder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$2.8MArts & Culture$257kCivil Rights$50kEducation$25kHealth$13kAnimals$13kEnvironment$11kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY$110,000
SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC$60,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THE HORSE SHELTER$10,000
SILVER BULLET PRODUCTIONS$10,000
FSTV$10,000
NM COUMMUNITY TRUST$5,000
HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANTUARY$2,500
MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$2,500
SITE SANTA FE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 6% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FOREVER NAVAJO FOUNDATION: $500 → 19%MAYO CLINIC: $10k → 9%CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $40k → 22%FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY: $110k → 14%BARNARD COLLEGE: $20k → 17%SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $60k → 12%NEW MEXICO PUBLIC BROADCAST: $500 → 14%HARA INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 10%NATIONAL JEWISH HOSPITAL: $3k → 12%LIVING ON EARTH: $5k → 9%MAYO CLNIC ORG CHALLENGE: $3k → 9%CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $25k → 22%SANTE FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10k → 12%SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10k → 12%SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10k → 12%SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC: $10k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $8k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $3k → 12%HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANTUARY: $3k → 12%MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $3k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $3k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $3k → 12%SITE SANTA FE: $2k → 12%MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $426k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $300k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $103k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $90k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75k → 12%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%THE HORSE SHELTER: $10k → 12%EARTH EDUCATION: $11k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN HOSPICE: $350 → 12%FOOD DEPOT LAS COMPANAS: $3k → 12%SILVER BULLET PRODUCTIONS: $10k → 12%PRO MUSICA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $300 → 12%KITCHEN ANGELS: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
NY
PA
CA
CO
AZ
NM
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 51% of Fay Shwayder Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Fay Shwayder Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$216k · 6 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$216k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
0%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD
    4× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +17%
  • CI
    CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +95%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • AN
    ACLU NEW MEXICO
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • BARNARD COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +48%
  • EE
    EARTH EDUCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Santa Fe Opera

To further the operatic art form by presenting ensemble performances of the highest quality in a varied repertoire of new as well as rarely performed and standard works, to ensure excellence of opera's future through its apprentice…

Arts & Culture
2
Santa Fe Institute

The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…

Science & Tech
3
Santa Fe Botanical Garden

The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…

Environment
4
Santa Fe Pro Musica Inc

Santa fe pro musica brings together outstanding musicians to inspire and educate audiences of all ages through the performance of great music.

Arts & Culture
5
San Francisco Conservatory of Music

The san francisco conservatory of music (sfcm) educates exceptionally talented musicians from around the world to become artists of the highest caliber, as well as musical citizens prepared for the challenges of the twenty-first century.

Education
6
The Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico
7
The Center for Contemporary Arts of Santa Fe Inc

Through a variety of media created by emerging and established artists, the center for contemporary arts of santa fe, inc. (center) presents the arts of our time as vital elements in the cultural dialogue in santa fe and throughout new…

Arts & Culture
8
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
9
Ojai Festivals Ltd

The ojai music festival serves as a creative music laboratory for pioneering new works,championing adventurous programming, and working with today's emerging artists with events during the year and the ojai music festival serves as a…

Arts & Culture
10
Ballet Arts Foundation

Ballet tucson is dedicated to bringing iconic, world-class dance performances and rising star artists to tucson and to sharing explorative experiences that inspire hope and excitement in our community.

Arts & Culture
11
New Mexico Philharmonic Inc

The new mexico philharmonic's mission is to enrich lives by providing excellent music, community engagement and educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
12
New Mexico School for the Arts - Arts Institute

New mexico school for the arts-art institute, assists passionate young artists in developing their full potential through a rigorous master of arts and academic education

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival Ltd and the most unlike its peers is Earth Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,708,500 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $110,000 · PhilanthropySANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD — $90,000 · Arts & CultureCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $65,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $30,500 · Arts & CultureSITE SANTA FE — $19,850 · Arts & CultureSilver Bullet Productions — $10,000 · Arts & CultureLUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC — $8,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $100 · Arts & CultureACLU NEW MEXICO — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherEARTH EDUCATION — $11,110 · OtherSANTE FE CHAMBER MUSIC — $10,000 · OtherFSTV — $10,000 · OtherSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FE — $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherNM COUMMUNITY TRUST — $5,000 · Other+11 more — $14,150 · OtherBARNARD COLLEGE — $20,000 · EducationTHE HORSE SHELTER — $10,000 · AnimalsTHE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $2,500 · AnimalsMAYO CLINIC — $10,000 · Health
Philanthropy$2,818,500Arts & Culture$223,450Other$133,260Education$20,000Animals$12,500Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,708,500 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD — $90,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $30,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSITE SANTA FE — $19,850 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEARTH EDUCATION — $11,110 over 1y, 22% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC — $8,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA DESERT CHORALE — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD
  • Who funds CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE
  • Who funds SITE SANTA FE
  • Who funds EARTH EDUCATION
  • Who funds THE HORSE SHELTER
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds Silver Bullet Productions
  • Who funds LUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC
  • Who funds THE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA DESERT CHORALE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fay Shwayder Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph