Skip to content

· Public charity

Farther Foundation

To inspire greater academic achievement and life success for students from low-income, at risk populations through participation in unique enrichment travel experiences.

$296k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$156kReligion$80kInternational$21k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $196,039, the rows itemized in this filing. The $295,536 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $99,497 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $160k
$12,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIEE$40,639
MINDS MATTER$34,787
EVANSTON SCHOLARS$23,955
THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED$19,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$18,872
HIGHSIGHT$12,500
CRISTO REY ST MARTIN$10,037
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$8,766
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$8,500
DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIO$7,449
YALE UNIVERSITY$6,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$5,534
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $19k → 16%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%STUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS: $12k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $9k → 10%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED: $40k → 14%ENVISION BY WORLD STRIDES: $10k → 6%CIEE: $41k → 7%MINDS MATTER: $35k → 17%THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED: $40k → 14%MINDS MATTER: $9k → 17%THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED: $19k → 14%MINDS MATTER: $7k → 17%HIGHSIGHT: $13k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOLARS: $61k → 14%NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $19k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOLARS: $45k → 14%NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $16k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOLARS: $24k → 14%CRISTO REY ST MARTIN: $10k → 14%DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIO: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314k · 4 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$314k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-4%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EVANSTON SCHOLARS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $129k · revenue +30%
  • TR
    THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED
    3× · 2023–2025 · $99k
  • MM
    MINDS MATTER OF NYC INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $51k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SD
    STUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -4%
  • EB
    ENVISION BY WORLD STRIDES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
4
Northeastern University
Education
5
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
11
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
12
Emmanuel College

Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Syracuse University; the most unlike its peers is Ciee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVANSTON SCHOLARS: $129,438 · EducationEVANSTON SCHOLARSNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $34,495 · EducationNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLSSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $8,766 · EducationTHE ROAD LESS TRAVELED: $99,000 · OtherTHE ROAD LESS TRAVELEDTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $18,872 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYCRISTO REY ST MARTIN: $10,037 · OtherCRISTO REY ST MARTINENVISION BY WORLD STRIDES: $9,665 · OtherENVISION BY WORLD STRIDESUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $8,500 · OtherDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIO: $7,449 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherCIEE Inc: $40,639 · InternationalCIEE IncSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC: $11,600 · InternationalSTUDENT DIPLO…MINDS MATTER OF NYC INC: $51,134 · Youth DevelopmentMINDS MATTER…HIGHSIGHT: $12,500 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY: $5,534 · Community Improvement
Education$172,699Other$159,523International$52,239Youth Development$51,134Community Improvement$18,034

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVANSTON SCHOLARS: $129,438 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF NYC INC: $51,134 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCIEE Inc: $40,639 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $34,495 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $18,872 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHSIGHT: $12,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC: $11,600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $8,766 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $5,534 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Farther Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Farther Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Farther Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Farther Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Farther’s filings →

    More from the funding graph