Skip to content

· Private foundation

Farbstein Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$107kFood & Nutrition$87kEnvironment$75kInternational$67kCivil Rights$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kHuman Services$19kArts & Culture$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$463k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$4,000
FEEDING AMERICA$3,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$3,000
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH$3,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$3,000
NARAL$3,000
SHELTER PARTNERSHIP$3,000
ST JOSEPH CENTER$3,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$3,000
LA REGIONAL FOOD BANK$3,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$2,500
CARE USA$2,000
NATIONAL MARFAN FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RED CROSS: $2k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $3k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $3k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $2k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
CA
VA
AR
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$498k · 50 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
8

Total granted

$498k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+57%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $27k · revenue ×11
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +315%
  • Feeding America
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • AA
    ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +105%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +39%
  • NN
    NAMI NAT'L ASSOC MENTAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
7
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
12
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
34/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $25,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKNARAL: $20,000 · OtherNARALPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $17,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODACLU: $11,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CENTER-VENICE: $10,000 · OtherSALK INSTITUTE ALZHEIMERS: $9,000 · OtherKCRW: $9,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8,000 · OtherNATIONAL MARFAN FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 · OtherCONCERN FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Other+25 more: $89,000 · Other+25 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $27,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN IN…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $12,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF…NEW ISRAEL FUND: $11,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $11,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED S…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $11,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTAN…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCOPERATION SMILE INC: $9,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INCHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATI…+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $20,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL D…FRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $20,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $18,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURC…HEAL THE BAY: $9,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAYPando Populus Inc: $3,500 · EnvironmentVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $18,500 · HealthVENICE FAMI…THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $12,000 · HealthTHE LOS ANG…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $9,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN…THE GUIDANCE CENTER: $9,000 · HealthTHE GUIDANC…NAMI National: $4,000 · HealthNAMI Nation…Feeding America: $20,500 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $15,000 · Food & NutritionST JOSEPH CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $11,000 · Youth Development
Other$233,500International$114,000Environment$70,500Health$52,500Food & Nutrition$35,500Human Services$12,000Youth Development$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $20,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $18,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GUIDANCE CENTER: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPENSECRETS: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPando Populus Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA PROMISE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds OPENSECRETS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Farbstein Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Farbstein Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Farbstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph