Skip to content
Farahnik Family Foundtn Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Farahnik Family Foundtn Charitable Trust

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$108kReligion$17kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$13kInternational$5kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$243
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA$2,000
SINAI TEMPLE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JHOUSE FAMILY FUND$526
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RABBI MOSES: $2k → 12%EMPOWER NEPALI GIRLS: $1k → 14%IAJF - EF: $5k → 6%TOV VACHESED INC: $5k → 17%JHOUSE FAMILY FUND: $526 → 20%MOAM ELIEZER INC: $1k → 6%LOOKING BEYOND: $1k → 14%TOV VACHESED INC: $5k → 17%JHOUSE FAMILY FUND: $526 → 20%NOAM ELIEZER INC: $1k → 6%STEFAN ADELIPOUR FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%TOV VACHESED INC: $4k → 17%LOOKING BEYOND: $1k → 14%TORAT HAYIM: $5k → 14%ETTA: $1k → 14%JEWS FOR JUDAISM: $1k → 14%MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $3k → 14%MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $3k → 14%NESSAH SYNAGOGUE: $21k → 14%CONGREGATION MOGEN DAVID: $4k → 14%NESSAH SYNAGOGUE: $14k → 14%IAJF: $1k → 14%NESSAH SYNAGOGUE: $9k → 14%SINAI TEMPLE: $1k → 14%RD&M KINDNESS FUND: $3k → 14%NESSAH SYNAGOGUE: $5k → 14%MOSADOT OHALEY YOSEF YAKOV ABOCHAZIRA: $1k → 14%SINAI TEMPLE: $11k → 14%MAGBIT FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%NESSAH SYNAGOGUE: $4k → 14%THE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%MAGBIT FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%NESSAH EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL CENTER: $1k → 14%RD&M KINDNESS FUND: $2k → 14%ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $700 → 14%CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 14%CEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA: $3k → 14%CEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA: $3k → 14%CEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA: $3k → 14%SINAI TEMPLE: $2k → 14%CEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA: $2k → 14%7 DORIM FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%CEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA: $2k → 14%SINAI TEMPLE: $2k → 14%CEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA: $2k → 14%SINAI TEMPLE: $1k → 14%GRAND PERFORMANCES: $1k → 14%THE ALEPH INSTITUTE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127k · 13 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
26

Total granted

$127k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+86%

Still filing today

31%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyInternationalCrime & LegalHealthReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2017–2021 · $53k
  • ST
    SINAI TEMPLE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $18k
  • CS
    CEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k

Funded once

  • TH
    TORAT HAYIM
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CM
    CONGREGATION MOGEN DAVID
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
2
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
3
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
4
Keren Yad Le-Yosef Foundation Trust
—
5
Chaim Maleh Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Asif Inc

ASIF helps its donees by providing information and performing due diligence on charitable organizations in Israel on the donees' behalf.

—
7
Chaverim Foundation Inc

To help the indigent and other charitable institutions.

Human Services
8
Shaarei Chesed of La

To assist jewish community with food, housing, job training, placement, life events and religious education

Public Benefit
9
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
10
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Meor Hachaim Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Magen Avraham Fund
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milken Community School; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $53,079 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSINAI TEMPLE: $18,270 · OtherSINAI TEMPLECEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALA: $13,500 · OtherCEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS GALATORAT HAYIM: $5,000 · OtherMILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+24 more: $30,984 · Other+24 moreTOV VACHESED INC: $13,100 · InternationalTOV VACHE…Empower Nepali Girls Inc: $1,000 · InternationalEmpower N…LOOKING ABOVE AND BEYOND INC: $8,155 · PhilanthropySTEFAN ADELIPOUR FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTAT FAMILY RELIEF FUND OF KOLEL SHA-AREI SHLOMO INC: $500 · PhilanthropyRD&M KINDNESS FUND: $4,500 · ReligionCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $3,000 · HealthGRAND PERFORMANCES: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$130,833International$14,100Philanthropy$9,655Religion$4,500Health$3,000Arts & Culture$1,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOV VACHESED INC: $13,100 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLOOKING ABOVE AND BEYOND INC: $8,155 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAGBIT FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEFAN ADELIPOUR FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmpower Nepali Girls Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND PERFORMANCES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAT FAMILY RELIEF FUND OF KOLEL SHA-AREI SHLOMO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOV VACHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds LOOKING ABOVE AND BEYOND INC ↗
  • Who funds MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RD&M KINDNESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds MAGBIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STEFAN ADELIPOUR FOR LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ↗
  • Who funds Empower Nepali Girls Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS ↗
  • Who funds GRAND PERFORMANCES ↗
  • Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds TAT FAMILY RELIEF FUND OF KOLEL SHA-AREI SHLOMO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…California Community …The Zarabi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundGs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · The Zarabi Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Farahnik Family Foundtn Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Farahnik Family Foundtn Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Farahnik Family Foundtn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home