Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$451kHealth$154kEducation$102kFood & Nutrition$54kHuman Services$42kReligion$41kYouth Development$22kAnimals$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LONGYEAR MUSEUM$28,750
WIDE HORIZON$22,000
FORT COLLINS SYMPHONY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CSU FOUNDATION$15,000
BRENTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
OFF THE HOOK ARTS$5,000
MIDWAY UNIVERSITY$2,000
OPERA FORT COLLINS$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY$2,000
LOVELAND OPERA THEATRE$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAR$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES: $2k → 4%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MA
CO
MO
KY
KS
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$970k · 17 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$970k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+25%

Still filing today

65%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    Fort Collins Symphony Association
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +53%
  • LONGYEAR FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +126%
  • OT
    Off the Hook Arts
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • TP
    THE PRINCIPLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -85%
  • VV
    VONS VISION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
3
Denver Children's Choir

To provide a challenging environment where children can reach their full potential by enhancing their musical talents, forging diverse meaningful friendships, and sharing their joy of music with others.

Arts & Culture
4
Colorado Symphony Association

The colorado symphony association (csa) is a not-for-profit organization established to fund and operate the colorado symphony orchestra for the enjoyment and benefit of the citizens of metropolitan denver and (cont'd on schedule…

Arts & Culture
5
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
6
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
7
Luther Classical College

Luther classical college educates lutherans in the classical, lutheran tradition and prepares them for godly vocations within family, church, and society, fostering christian culture through study of the best of our western heritage.

Education
8
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
9
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
10
Bravo Colorado At Beaver Creek-Vail Inc Dba Bravo Vail Valley Music Festival

Enriching people's lives through the power of music.*producing the finest performances by the greatest artists*fostering music education, and*promoting a life-long appreciation for the arts

Arts & Culture
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Colorado Children's Chorale

The mission of the colorado children's chorale is to share professional choral music with the global community by training excellent young performers.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Noco Humane. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fort Collins Symphony Association: $145,000 · OtherFort Collins Symphony AssociationIndividual grant recipient: $72,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOOD BANK: $22,000 · OtherFOOD BANKBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAR: $21,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS: $20,000 · Other+15 more: $68,100 · Other+15 moreLONGYEAR FOUNDATION: $134,750 · Arts & CultureLONGYEAR FOUNDATIONOff the Hook Arts: $90,000 · Arts & CultureOff the Hook ArtsOPERA FORT COLLINS INC: $78,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA FORT COLLINS INC+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureWIDE HORIZON INC: $147,000 · HealthWIDE HORIZON INCCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $85,000 · EducationCOLORADO ST…MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $17,000 · EducationMIDWAY UNIV…RESPITE CARE INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesGRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesNoco Humane: $18,000 · AnimalsThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $12,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$403,100Arts & Culture$304,750Health$147,000Education$102,000Human Services$42,000Animals$18,000Food & Nutrition$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWIDE HORIZON INC: $147,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetFort Collins Symphony Association: $145,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetLONGYEAR FOUNDATION: $134,750 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetOff the Hook Arts: $90,000 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA FORT COLLINS INC: $78,000 over 9y, 9.6% of budgetRESPITE CARE INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNoco Humane: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRINCIPLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVELAND OPERA THEATRE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WIDE HORIZON INC ↗
  • Who funds Fort Collins Symphony Association ↗
  • Who funds LONGYEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Off the Hook Arts ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERA FORT COLLINS INC ↗
  • Who funds RESPITE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Noco Humane ↗
  • Who funds MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
  • Who funds THE PRINCIPLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE AQUATIC CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVELAND OPERA THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds PEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ColoradoCO19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · The Griffin Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Isabel Foundation · United Way of Larimer County · Tenacre Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph