Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Family Care Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$218k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$2.0MEducation$349kHuman Services$320kHealth$84kInternational$25kHousing & Shelter$19kEmployment$18kCivil Rights$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $164k
$3,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$957k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAWLS SPRINGS BAPTIST CHURCH$49,700
MAYBANK BAPTIST CHURCH$42,100
WILLIAM CAREY COLLEGE$24,000
LOUISIANA BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME$14,000
Individual grant recipient$12,500
HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN$12,000
THE BAPTIST CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$10,000
LUMBERTON CHURCH OF CHRIST$8,000
Baxterville Baptist Church$7,000
CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC$4,800
Church of Christ of Collins$3,500
Church of Christ of Petal$3,500
KENSINGTON WOODS CHURCH$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
PRESBYTERIAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$3,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MI
NY
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
LA
MS
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Family Care Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in MS; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Family Care Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 52 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

52 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
34

Total granted

$2.9M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+14%

Still filing today

15%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +47%
  • WC
    William Carey University
    2× · 2017–2018 · $76k · revenue +111%
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • IM
    INSPIRATION MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTI
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • UO
    UNIV OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Mark Driscoll Ministries

To proclaim the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Gospel Revivals Inc

To engage in christian evangelism through the publication and worldwide distribution of "herald of his coming" periodical

6
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
7
Jim King Ministries Inc

Proclaim the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
8
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

9
God's Bible School College & Missionary Training Home

God's bible school and college seeks to glorify god and to serve his church by providing higher education centered in holy scripture and shaped by wesleyan conviction, thus preparing faithful servants to proclaim jesus christ and spread…

Education
10
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

12
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Home of Grace Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Prophecy in the News Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RAWLS SPRINGS BAPTIST CHURCH — $779,100 · OtherRAWLS SPRINGS BAPTIST CHURCHMAYBANK BAPTIST CHURCH — $344,308 · OtherMAYBANK BAPTIST CHURCHWILLIAM CAREY COLLEGE — $173,000 · OtherWILLIAM CAREY COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $168,387 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOUISIANA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME AND FAMILY MINISTRIES — $108,500 · OtherTHE BAPTIST CHILDRENS VILLAGE — $99,000 · Other+78 more — $1,223,527 · Other+78 moreHOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC — $102,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $50,325 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $17,400 · InternationalSTEPS OF HOPE-GUATEMALA INC — $8,000 · International
Other$2,895,822Human Services$102,000Education$50,325International$25,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOUISIANA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME AND FAMILY MINISTRIES — $108,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC — $102,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetWilliam Carey University — $75,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $50,325 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCARROLL ROBERSON MINISTRIES INC — $49,200 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES INTL — $40,650 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOME OF GRACE CORPORATION — $24,400 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $18,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $17,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMid-South chapter of paralyzed veterans of America — $1,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOUISIANA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME AND FAMILY MINISTRIES
  • Who funds HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds William Carey University
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds CARROLL ROBERSON MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds JEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES INTL
  • Who funds HOME OF GRACE CORPORATION
  • Who funds STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rosewood FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rosewood Foundation · Pinebelt Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Family Care Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph