Skip to content
Faith and Learning International NFP at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Faith and Learning International NFP

FLI exists to help followers of Jesus Christ live-out God's call in their lives.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$2.0MCommunity Improvement$217kHousing & Shelter$162kInternational$53kEducation$50kRecreation & Sports$39kHealth$26kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $280,286, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,882,343 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,602,057 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $140k
$25,950
Median grant
—
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brookhaven Church$139,633
Langham Partners USA Inc$43,314
Belay Global -V$29,688
Genesis Health Foundation$25,950
Pan De Vida Inc$20,000
Alula's Dream Foundation$11,701
ABWE Donor Services$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $195k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Deliberate: $9k → 14%BELAY GLOBAL: $28k → 9%BELAY GLOBAL: $74k → 9%BELAY GLOBAL: $32k → 9%BELAY GLOBAL: $27k → 9%Belay Global -V: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
OR
IN
CO
MO
AZ
AR
NC
SC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $3.6M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, $2.4M to organizations and $1.2M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$1.6M · 45% · 21 grants · 19 people

Stated purpose: Project expenses

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.2M · 34% · 21 grants · 25 people

Stated purpose: Project expenses

South Asia$492k · 14% · 4 grants · 8 people

Stated purpose: Project expenses

North America (Canada and Mexico)$119k · 3% · 1 grant · 21 people

Stated purpose: Project expenses

South America$77k · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Project expenses

East Asia and the Pacific$43k · 1% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Project Expenses

Central America and the Caribbean$29k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Project expenses

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 14 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$2.4M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+15%

Still filing today

43%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • E3
    ENGAGE 360 MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $641k · revenue +16% · 92% of their budget
  • LF
    LIFE FOR THE INNOCENT
    2× · 2019–2021 · $398k · revenue +112% · 33% of their budget
  • BG
    Belay Global Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $217k · revenue +113% · 85% of their budget

Funded once

  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $34k · revenue +15%
  • TE
    THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
  • IW
    IMPACT WORLD CHANGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $31k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
2
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
3
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
4
Engage International Inc

Train local pastors for Gospel ministry

Religion
5
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
6
Equippers Group International

To produce and publish training materials for church leadership and development. To facilitate churches groups and individual participation in world mission.

Religion
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

—
9
Verticle Living Ministries

To equip disciples of Jesus Christ to balance and live their lives to glorify God in every area of life; spirituall, personally, communally and physically by

Religion
10
Grace Connections Inc

Leadership training, discipleship, serving the local church optional for others.) both domestically and internationally

Religion
11
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
12
Brave Global Inc

Planting churches. Developing leaders. Advancing the kingdom.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overseas Council International Inc; the most unlike its peers is The John Brown University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENGAGE 360 MINISTRIES INC: $640,906 · ReligionENGAGE 360 MINISTRIES INCLIFE FOR THE INNOCENT: $398,468 · ReligionLIFE FOR THE INNOCENTPROJECT VIDEO INC: $102,672 · ReligionPROJECT VIDEO INCLANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC NFP: $85,051 · ReligionLANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC NFP+5 more: $91,656 · Religion+5 moreBROOKHAVEN CHURCH OF CHRIST: $307,148 · OtherBROOKHAVEN CHURCH OF CHRISTWHEATON BIBLE CHURCH: $156,076 · OtherWHEATON BIBLE CHURCHSOUTH GATE BAPTIST CHURCH: $95,300 · OtherSOUTH GATE BAPTIST CHURCHOVERSEAS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL INC: $59,500 · OtherOVERSEAS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL INCNEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $55,170 · OtherNEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCHGOODSPORTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $38,824 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA: $32,011 · Other+6 more: $105,672 · Other+6 moreBelay Global Inc: $216,556 · Human ServicesBelay Glo…DELIBERATE: $8,547 · Human ServicesPan De Vida Inc: $161,527 · InternationalGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $33,500 · EducationTHE JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 · EducationALULA DREAM FOUNDATION: $11,701 · Education
Religion$1,318,753Other$849,701Human Services$225,103International$161,527Education$61,201

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENGAGE 360 MINISTRIES INC: $640,906 over 6y, 92% of budgetLIFE FOR THE INNOCENT: $398,468 over 2y, 33% of budgetBelay Global Inc: $216,556 over 6y, 85% of budgetPan De Vida Inc: $161,527 over 4y, 66% of budgetPROJECT VIDEO INC: $102,672 over 2y, 12% of budgetLANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC NFP: $85,051 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $33,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT WORLD CHANGE INC: $31,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetFOUR10 MINISTRIES INC: $23,821 over 1y, 56% of budgetOC International Support Foundation: $22,386 over 2y, 40% of budgetALULA DREAM FOUNDATION: $11,701 over 1y, 12% of budgetEAST MOUNTAIN GREENVILLE: $8,899 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetDELIBERATE: $8,547 over 1y, 13% of budgetJosiah Venture: $5,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENGAGE 360 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE FOR THE INNOCENT ↗
  • Who funds Belay Global Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pan De Vida Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VIDEO INC ↗
  • Who funds LANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC NFP ↗
  • Who funds OVERSEAS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT WORLD CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUR10 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OC International Support Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALULA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAST MOUNTAIN GREENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds DELIBERATE ↗
  • Who funds Josiah Venture ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Signatry Charitab…Natl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Signatry Charitable TrustSD12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faith and Learning International NFP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faith and Learning International NFP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • George Fox University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Faith and Learning International NFP?

Find your warmest path to Faith and Learning International NFP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Faith and Learning International NFP’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home