· Private foundation
F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of F V HALL & MARYLOU HALL CHILDRENS CRISIS FUND’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANGELO INC | $7,000 |
| FAMILY SHELTER OF SAN ANGELO | $4,500 |
| JAMES PHILLIPS WILLIAMS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE SAN ANGELO | $2,000 |
| HOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO | $2,000 |
| CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK SAN ANGELO - SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER | $2,000 |
| RUST STREET MINISTRIES | $2,000 |
| WEST TEXAS GUIDANCE & COUNSELING | $2,000 |
| CHILDRENS'S HOPE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC | $2,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY | $2,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO | $2,000 |
| SAN ANGELO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| RAINBOW ROOM - CONCHO VALLEY | $2,000 |
| THE WEST TEXAS REHABILITATION CENTER | $1,704 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center4× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +13%
- PHPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC2× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +33%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY3× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- STSONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INCone grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -53%
- RRRAINBOW ROOM -GREATER CONCHO VALLEY COMMUNITYone grant, 2021 · $13k
- CMCHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK SAN ANGELO -one grant, 2021 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance the ability of families to protect, nuture, and educate their children in the first five years of life and enable them to enter school ready to learn.
The alcohol and drug abuse council for the concho valley's mission is to save lives and create healthier communities.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
The mission of any baby can is to serve families of children and youth facing serious health or developmental challenges. barriers of income and location are addressed by providing all services at no cost to the families and at a location…
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
Lone star circle of care provides exceptional and accessible patient centered healthcare for our texas neighbors, focusing on the underserved.
Our mission is to provide Accessible and Affordable Holistic-Based mental-health care to the communities we serve without without regard to their background or insurance status in a caring environment.
To provide education, advocacy, and affordable, high-quality health care services, so all can access preventive, sexual, and reproductive health care without judgment.
To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Concho Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Help Center of Concho Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN ANGELO INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds SONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds RUST STREET MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds JAMES PHILLIPS WILLIAMS MEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACCESSABILITY FIRST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Angelo Health Foundation · San Angelo Area Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · James B and Lois R Archer Charitable Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund?
Find your warmest path to F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.