Skip to content

· Private foundation

F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$98kHealth$78kCommunity Improvement$20kEducation$15kYouth Development$12kCrime & Legal$10kReligion$8kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCESSABILITY FIRST FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
SAN ANGELO SALVATION ARMY$2,000
DESK OF SAN ANGELO$2,000
SIERRA VISTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - CHILDREN'S BED PROJECT$2,000
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK SAN ANGELO - SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER$2,000
SAN ANGELO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION$2,000
THE WEST TEXAS REHABILITATION CENTER$2,000
SAN ANGELO FAMILY NETWORK$2,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS$2,000
RUST STREET MINISTRIES$2,000
TOM GREEN COUNTY HUNGER COALITION$2,000
JAMES PHILLIPS WILLIAMS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,500
HOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO: $13k → 13%ACCESSABILITY FIRST FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $3k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY: $3k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $3k → 13%ACCESSABILITY FIRST FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 21 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$199k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+4%

Still filing today

48%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthReligionCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    The West Texas Rehabilitation Center
    5× · 2021–2026 · $23k · revenue +13%
  • PH
    PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +33%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JAMES PHILLIPS WILLIAMS MEMORIAL
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • ST
    SONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -53%
  • CM
    CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK SAN ANGELO -
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
3
Healthy Families San Angelo

To enhance the ability of families to protect, nuture, and educate their children in the first five years of life and enable them to enter school ready to learn.

—
4
Alcohol & Drug Abuse Council for the Concho Valley

The alcohol and drug abuse council for the concho valley's mission is to save lives and create healthier communities.

—
5
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
6
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
7
Novelty Behavioral Health

Our mission is to provide Accessible and Affordable Holistic-Based mental-health care to the communities we serve without without regard to their background or insurance status in a caring environment.

Health
8
El Paso Center for Children Inc

El paso center for children, inc's purpose is to provide homes for dependent and neglected children and an array of support services for emotionally disturbed children, adolescents, and their families. the organization operates entirely in…

—
9
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
10
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
11
Austin Travis County Mhmr Center Dba Integral Care

Atcic's mission is to improve the lives of people affected by behavioral health and developmental and/or intellectual challenges.

Health
12
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institute of Cognitive Development Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Help Center of Concho Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO: $22,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY OF TEXAS SAN ANGELOCHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK SAN ANGELO - SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER: $14,500 · OtherCHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK SAN ANGELO - SHANNON MEDICAL CENTERTHE JAMES PHILLIPS WILLIAMS MEMORIAL: $12,500 · OtherTHE JAMES PHILLIPS WILLIAMS MEMORIALCHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK SAN ANGELO -: $12,500 · OtherCHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK SAN ANGELO -RAINBOW ROOM -GREATER CONCHO VALLEY COMMUNITY: $12,500 · OtherRAINBOW ROOM -GREATER CONCHO VALLEY COMMUNITYBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $12,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEYIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC DBA SONRISAS: $7,500 · OtherSIERRA VISTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - CHILDREN'S BED PROJECT: $6,500 · OtherFAMILY SHELTER OF SAN ANGELO: $6,000 · Other+15 more: $46,500 · Other+15 morePREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY H…ACCESSABILITY FIRST FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesACCESSABILI…LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesLA ESPERANZ…The West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $23,452 · HealthThe West T…CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT: $3,000 · HealthCONCHO VAL…JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN ANGELO INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO: $9,000 · ReligionRUST STREET MINISTRIES: $7,500 · ReligionSONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS: $10,000 · Civil RightsUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropySAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$161,500Human Services$29,000Health$26,452Community Improvement$20,000Religion$16,500Recreation & Sports$12,500Civil Rights$10,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $23,452 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN ANGELO INC: $20,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $12,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO: $9,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRUST STREET MINISTRIES: $7,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetACCESSABILITY FIRST FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetLA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN ANGELO INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO ↗
  • Who funds RUST STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSABILITY FIRST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES PHILLIPS WILLIAMS MEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Angelo Health FoundationTX28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Angelo Health Foundation · San Angelo Area Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · James B and Lois R Archer Charitable Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund?

    Find your warmest path to F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph