· Private foundation
F Irving Hutchins Charitable Trust Xxxxx9004
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE | $22,000 |
| THE WILD CENTER | $11,000 |
| LUNDSTRUM PERFORMING ARTS | $10,000 |
| ST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $10,000 |
| CHAUTAUGUA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $6,650 |
| EERIE COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $6,650 |
| YMCA CAPE COD | $5,000 |
| EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC | $5,000 |
| SUDBURY EXTENDED DAY | $3,400 |
| EMMANUEL CHURCH | $3,000 |
| ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $2,465 |
| CHILDRENS CENTER FOR COMMUNICATION | $2,455 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREAT ROCHESTER | $2,155 |
| CHRIST CHAPEL WESLEYAN CHURCH | $2,155 |
| BRECK SCHOOL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE7× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +4%
THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC7× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +288%- NHNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS3× · 2023–2025 · $22k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- CDCAMP DUDLEY INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -14%
SOMERVILLE HOMELESS COALITION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +27%
United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Incone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rochester Area Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Upper Cape Chaplaincy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WELLS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS ↗
- Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELONGING TO EACH OTHER INC ↗
- Who funds Breck School ↗
- Who funds CABOT PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP DUDLEY INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER FRIENDLY HOME ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS CENTER FOR COMMUNICATION INC BEVERLY SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368) ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE FAMILY OF AGENCIES ↗
- Who funds UPPER CAPE CHAPLAINCY ↗
- Who funds Cape Cod Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SOMERVILLE HOMELESS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Norwalk Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation · The Hutchins Family Foundation Inc · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Finger Lakes Area Community Endowment · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization F Irving Hutchins Charitable Trust Xxxxx9004 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Somerville Homeless Coalition Inc — 31% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Cabot Performing Arts Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Action Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cape Cod Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wilton Library Association Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Epiphany School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Childrens Center for Communication Inc Beverly School for the Deaf — 0% of income from government
- Our Sisters School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to F Irving Hutchins Charitable Trust Xxxxx9004?
Find your warmest path to F Irving Hutchins Charitable Trust Xxxxx9004 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.