Skip to content
Everstrong Prevention at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Everstrong Prevention

To prevent child sexual exploitation and trafficking through education, advocacy, and empowerment.

$260k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.3MHousing & Shelter$967kCrime & Legal$854kYouth Development$276kCivil Rights$177kEmployment$80k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $205,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $259,876 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $54,876 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$559k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPS$65,000
Scarlet Road$50,000
Innovations HTC IHTC$35,000
BEST$25,000
Found for Youth Resilience$20,000
REST$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS: $140k → 9%Innovations Human Trafficking: $66k → 9%Scarlet Road: $50k → 10%Room One: $19k → 17%Org for Prostitution Survivor: $120k → 9%INNOVATIONS HTC: $50k → 9%SCARLET ROAD: $38k → 10%Org for Prostitution Survivor: $102k → 9%Innovations Human Trafficking: $32k → 9%Scarlet Road: $31k → 10%ORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS: $90k → 9%Innovations HTC IHTC: $35k → 9%Scarlet Road: $18k → 10%Org for Prostitution Survivor: $70k → 9%SCARLET ROAD: $18k → 10%OPS: $65k → 9%BEST: $25k → 9%YouthCare: $371k → 9%YouthCare: $326k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $300k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $200k → 9%YouthCare: $70k → 9%YMCA: $63k → 9%ORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS: $65k → 9%YMCA: $63k → 9%Businesses Ending Slav & Traf: $65k → 9%ORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS: $50k → 9%Businesses Ending Slav & Traf: $41k → 9%BUSINESSES ENDING SLAVERY AND TRAFFICKING: $15k → 9%Businesses Ending Slav & Traf: $15k → 9%BUSINESSES ENDING SLAVERY AND TRAFFICKING: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 10 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.6M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+14%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Y
    YOUTHCARE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +23%
  • OF
    ORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $702k · revenue +99%
  • BE
    Businesses Ending Slavery & Trafficking
    8× · 2017–2024 · $286k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • RO
    Room One
    one grant, 2020 · $19k · revenue -38%
  • King County Sexual Assault Resource Center
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center

Rebuilding Hope offers support toward healing through advocacy and therapy for those affected by sexual assault abuse and commercial sexual exploitation. Through education and collaboration Rebuilding Hope improves the communitys response…

—
2
Safety Compass

The organization's mission is to offer support for survivors of commercial sexual exploitation and human trafficking, navigating the criminal and social justice systems in the northwest region of oregon.

Human Services
3
Sexual Violence Law Center

Sexual Violence Law Center (SVLC) is a nonprofit law firm that protects the safety, privacy, and civil rights of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in Washington through holistic and trauma-informed practices rooted in race and…

Human Services
4
Coalition Ending Gender-Based Violence

To end gender-based violence and promote equitable relationships through collective action for social change.

Crime & Legal
5
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
6
Northwest Network Btlg Survivors Abuse0

The Northwest Network of Bisexual Trans Lesbians and Gay Survivors of Abuse supports queer and trans survivors in reconnecting to their self-determination through advocacy-based counseling and community education.

Health
7
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
8
Scarlet Rope Project

The Scarlet Rope Project exists to provide a safe place for healing and restoration to survivors of sex trafficking.

Human Services
9
National Trafficking Sheltered Alliance

The National Trafficking Sheltered Alliance is a network of service providers committed to enhancing services and increasing access to care for survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation.

—
10
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
11
San Francisco Women Against Rape

San Francisco Women Against Rape is a community-based rape crisis center. We provide support to sexual assault survivors, their family members, significant others, and friends. We use education as a tool of prevention. Direct services…

—
12
Youth Collaboratory Inc

Youth Collaboratory harnesses the power of the youth services community to innovate, evaluate, and drive effective strategies that assure the safety and well-being of youth and young adults, unlocking their limitless potential.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Organization for Prostitution Survivors; the most unlike its peers is The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Seattle (6871). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTHCARE: $1,266,784 · Human ServicesYOUTHCAREORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS: $701,551 · Human ServicesORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORSBusinesses Ending Slavery & Trafficking: $286,260 · Human ServicesBusinesses Ending Slavery & TraffickingInnovations Human Trafficking Collaborative: $182,750 · Human ServicesInnovations Human Trafficking CollaborativeSCARLET ROAD: $155,080 · Human ServicesSCARLET ROADTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $126,000 · Human Services+1 more: $18,500 · Human ServicesSEATTLE AGAINST SLAVERY: $333,500 · OtherSEATTLE AGAINS…FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH RESILIENCY AND ENGA: $119,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR…+1 more: $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN AND YOUTH JUSTICE CENTER: $235,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN AND …REAL ESCAPE FROM THE SEX TRADE: $202,680 · Crime & LegalREAL ESCAPE F…
Human Services$2,736,925Other$462,500Crime & Legal$437,680

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTHCARE: $1,266,784 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS: $701,551 over 8y, 17% of budgetSEATTLE AGAINST SLAVERY: $333,500 over 5y, 21% of budgetBusinesses Ending Slavery & Trafficking: $286,260 over 8y, 15% of budgetCHILDREN AND YOUTH JUSTICE CENTER: $235,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetREAL ESCAPE FROM THE SEX TRADE: $202,680 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetInnovations Human Trafficking Collaborative: $182,750 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetSCARLET ROAD: $155,080 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $126,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR YOUTH RESILIENCY AND ENGA: $119,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetRoom One: $18,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKing County Sexual Assault Resource Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationMedina FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…Ellison FoundationBuilding ChangesMoccasin Lake Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Seattle FoundationWA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ellison Foundation · Building Changes · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Everstrong Prevention funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Everstrong Prevention. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Everstrong Prevention’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home