Skip to content

· Private foundation

Evergreene Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$203kArts & Culture$170kCommunity Improvement$45kEnvironment$37kHealth$35kFood & Nutrition$30kHuman Services$28kHousing & Shelter$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$743k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Krasl Art Center$5,000
Otsego Area Historical Society$5,000
Three Rivers Public Library Friends$4,000
Friends of Otsego Public Library$4,000
Water Street Glassworks$4,000
Mendon Community School Foundation$4,000
Marcellus Library$4,000
Southwest MI Land Conservancy$4,000
Sturgis Area Community Foundation-Scidmore Park$4,000
Benton Harbor Public Library$4,000
Friends of the Mendon Library$4,000
Keystone Place Inc$3,000
Kairos Dwelling$3,000
Domestic Sexual Abuse Services St Joseph County$3,000
Otsego Public Schools Foundation$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kairos Dwelling: $3k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%Kairos Dwelling: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $1k → 12%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%Three Rivers Area Mentoring: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%Three Rivers Area Mentoring: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$603k · 51 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
8

Total granted

$603k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+353%

Still filing today

43%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WATER STREET GLASSWORKS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +221%
  • EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +82%
  • SM
    SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • BH
    Beacon Health Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +353%
  • OP
    OTSEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN FOOD
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
2
Art Reach of Mid Michigan

Community art center organized to promote, stimulate and encourage involvement, appreciation, enjoyment and understanding of the arts in mid-michigan

—
3
Portage Center for the Arts Inc

Promote and foster the arts by providing a community venue and programming for the visual arts, performing arts and art education.

Arts & Culture
4
Port Huron Museum of Arts & History

To provide a cultural center and museum for the city of port huron and environs, and to encourage and solicit the giving of objects of art, scientific, or historic interest for display and exhibitions.

Arts & Culture
5
The Arts Commission of Greater Toledo I

To develop and promote arts in the greater toledo community

Arts & Culture
6
Rochester Contemporary Art Center Inc

To create dialogue and build community through contemporary art exhibitions and related programs

Arts & Culture
7
Rockport Cultural Arts District

Bring recognition to the cultural arts and promote economic and cultural development in the downtown rockport area.

Arts & Culture
8
Cedar Center Arts Inc

The mission of the art garage is to encourage an appreciation for the participation in the visual, performing and literary arts.

Arts & Culture
9
Waterfall Arts

Providing access to the arts, design and creative collaboration for all ages and abilities throughout the belfast and montvillecommunities in waldo county, maine.

Arts & Culture
10
Grand Rapids Art Museum Foundation

To provide financial support for the grand rapids art museum.

Arts & Culture
11
Marquette County Historical Society

Preserving the history of our area brings an understanding to the past and present, and provides a guide for the future. we not only maintain exhibits, artifacts and a research library, we provide a forum for engaging the community and…

Arts & Culture
12
Bemidji Community Arts Council Inc

To nurture, exhibit and promote the visual arts

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Krasl Art Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Twin City Players. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTSEGO AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $19,000 · OtherOTSEGO AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETYOtsego Public Schools Foundation: $18,000 · OtherOtsego Public Schools FoundationMarcellus Library: $17,000 · OtherFriends of Otsego Public Library: $16,000 · OtherMENDON SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $15,598 · OtherSOUTHWEST MI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 · OtherTHREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS: $15,000 · OtherGlen Oaks Community College Foundat: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE MENDON LIBRARY: $15,000 · OtherBenton Harbor Public Library: $13,000 · OtherTWO RIVERS COALITION INC: $12,000 · Other+33 more: $166,150 · Other+33 moreWATER STREET GLASSWORKS: $33,000 · Arts & CultureWATER STREET GLASSWO…KRASL ART CENTER INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureKRASL ART CENTER INCBenton Harbor Arts Association: $16,000 · Arts & CultureBenton Harbor Arts A…ARS ARTS & CULTURE CENTER: $15,000 · Arts & CultureARS ARTS & CULTURE C…TWIN CITY PLAYERS: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITY PLAYERSTHE HERITAGE MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HERITAGE MUSEUM …+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationEASTERN MI…MENDON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationMENDON COM…THREE RIVERS PROMISE: $11,000 · EducationTHREE RIVE…DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $20,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC …KAIROS DWELLING: $17,000 · Human ServicesKAIROS DW…THREE RIVERS ACADEMIC MENTORING INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesTHREE RIV…KEYSTONE PLACE INC: $26,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentTHREE RIVERS FOOD SITE INC: $6,500 · Food & NutritionMARCELLUS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $6,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$336,748Arts & Culture$112,000Education$59,000Human Services$53,000Housing & Shelter$26,000Environment$20,000Food & Nutrition$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATER STREET GLASSWORKS: $33,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE PLACE INC: $26,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetKRASL ART CENTER INC: $21,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $20,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetOtsego Public Schools Foundation: $18,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMENDON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetKAIROS DWELLING: $17,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetBenton Harbor Arts Association: $16,000 over 9y, 41% of budgetTHREE RIVERS ACADEMIC MENTORING INC: $16,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetARS ARTS & CULTURE CENTER: $15,000 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetTWIN CITY PLAYERS: $15,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetTHREE RIVERS PROMISE: $11,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART: $10,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetST JOSEPH COUNTY UNITED WAY: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HERITAGE MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER: $10,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetAPPLE FARM COMMUNITY INC: $8,100 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHREE RIVERS FOOD SITE INC: $6,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMARCELLUS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $6,500 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetDETROIT DOG RESCUE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WATER STREET GLASSWORKS ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds KRASL ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Otsego Public Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MENDON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KAIROS DWELLING ↗
  • Who funds Benton Harbor Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS ACADEMIC MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds ARS ARTS & CULTURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITY PLAYERS ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds APPLE FARM COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS FOOD SITE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCELLUS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John E Fetzer Institute IncMI25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John E Fetzer Institute Inc · Berrien Community Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · The Schalon Foundation · St Joseph County United Way · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evergreene Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evergreene Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Evergreene Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Evergreene Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Evergreene’s filings →

    More from the funding graph