Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Evergreene Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$203kArts & Culture$170kCommunity Improvement$45kEnvironment$37kHealth$35kFood & Nutrition$30kHuman Services$28kHousing & Shelter$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$743k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Krasl Art Center$5,000
Otsego Area Historical Society$5,000
Three Rivers Public Library Friends$4,000
Marcellus Library$4,000
Friends of the Mendon Library$4,000
Friends of Otsego Public Library$4,000
Benton Harbor Public Library$4,000
Water Street Glassworks$4,000
Sturgis Area Community Foundation-Scidmore Park$4,000
Southwest MI Land Conservancy$4,000
Mendon Community School Foundation$4,000
Kairos Dwelling$3,000
Domestic Sexual Abuse Services St Joseph County$3,000
Keystone Place Inc$3,000
Otsego Public Schools Foundation$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kairos Dwelling: $3k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%Kairos Dwelling: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $2k → 12%KAIROS DWELLING: $1k → 12%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%Three Rivers Area Mentoring: $2k → 13%DOMESTIC SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%Three Rivers Area Mentoring: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $2k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA MENTORING: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$603k · 51 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
8

Total granted

$603k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+353%

Still filing today

43%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WATER STREET GLASSWORKS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +93%
  • EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +82%
  • SM
    SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • OP
    OTSEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • BH
    Beacon Health Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +353%
  • OP
    OSTEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
2
Art Reach of Mid Michigan

Community art center organized to promote, stimulate and encourage involvement, appreciation, enjoyment and understanding of the arts in mid-michigan

3
Portage Center for the Arts Inc

Promote and foster the arts by providing a community venue and programming for the visual arts, performing arts and art education.

Arts & Culture
4
Port Huron Museum of Arts & History

To provide a cultural center and museum for the city of port huron and environs, and to encourage and solicit the giving of objects of art, scientific, or historic interest for display and exhibitions.

Arts & Culture
5
The Arts Commission of Greater Toledo I

To develop and promote arts in the greater toledo community

Arts & Culture
6
Rochester Contemporary Art Center Inc

To create dialogue and build community through contemporary art exhibitions and related programs

Arts & Culture
7
Rockport Cultural Arts District

Bring recognition to the cultural arts and promote economic and cultural development in the downtown rockport area.

Arts & Culture
8
Cedar Center Arts Inc

The mission of the art garage is to encourage an appreciation for the participation in the visual, performing and literary arts.

Arts & Culture
9
Waterfall Arts

Providing access to the arts, design and creative collaboration for all ages and abilities throughout the belfast and montvillecommunities in waldo county, maine.

Arts & Culture
10
Grand Rapids Art Museum Foundation

To provide financial support for the grand rapids art museum.

Arts & Culture
11
Marquette County Historical Society

Preserving the history of our area brings an understanding to the past and present, and provides a guide for the future. we not only maintain exhibits, artifacts and a research library, we provide a forum for engaging the community and…

Arts & Culture
12
Bemidji Community Arts Council Inc

To nurture, exhibit and promote the visual arts

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Krasl Art Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Twin City Players. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Community FoundationsDog and Cat RescueEducation & Youth Support F…Diverse Community Support S…Regional Tourism & Economic…Community Arts CentersVulnerable Population Suppo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%15%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr13%26%20–35yr18%26%35–55yr18%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%9%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr13%30%20–35yr18%32%35–55yr18%13%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
9%
305/3,267

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OTSEGO AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $19,000 · OtherOTSEGO AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETYOtsego Public Schools Foundation — $18,000 · OtherOtsego Public Schools FoundationMarcellus Library — $17,000 · OtherFriends of Otsego Public Library — $16,000 · OtherMENDON SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $15,598 · OtherGlen Oaks Community College Foundat — $15,000 · OtherTHREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS — $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE MENDON LIBRARY — $15,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST MI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $15,000 · OtherBenton Harbor Public Library — $13,000 · OtherTWO RIVERS COALITION INC — $12,000 · Other+33 more — $166,150 · Other+33 moreWATER STREET GLASSWORKS — $33,000 · Arts & CultureWATER STREET GLASSWO…KRASL ART CENTER INC — $21,000 · Arts & CultureKRASL ART CENTER INCBenton Harbor Arts Association — $16,000 · Arts & CultureBenton Harbor Arts A…ARS ARTS & CULTURE CENTER — $15,000 · Arts & CultureARS ARTS & CULTURE C…TWIN CITY PLAYERS — $15,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITY PLAYERSTHE HERITAGE MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HERITAGE MUSEUM …+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationEASTERN MI…MENDON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $18,000 · EducationMENDON COM…THREE RIVERS PROMISE — $11,000 · EducationTHREE RIVE…DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES — $20,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC …KAIROS DWELLING — $17,000 · Human ServicesKAIROS DW…THREE RIVERS ACADEMIC MENTORING INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesTHREE RIV…KEYSTONE PLACE INC — $26,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentTHREE RIVERS FOOD SITE INC — $6,500 · Food & NutritionMARCELLUS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $6,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$336,748Arts & Culture$112,000Education$59,000Human Services$53,000Housing & Shelter$26,000Environment$20,000Food & Nutrition$13,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWATER STREET GLASSWORKS — $33,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE PLACE INC — $26,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetKRASL ART CENTER INC — $21,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC — $20,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES — $20,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetOtsego Public Schools Foundation — $18,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMENDON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetKAIROS DWELLING — $17,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHREE RIVERS ACADEMIC MENTORING INC — $16,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetBenton Harbor Arts Association — $16,000 over 9y, 41% of budgetARS ARTS & CULTURE CENTER — $15,000 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetTWIN CITY PLAYERS — $15,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetTHREE RIVERS PROMISE — $11,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTHE HERITAGE MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER — $10,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART — $10,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetST JOSEPH COUNTY UNITED WAY — $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAPPLE FARM COMMUNITY INC — $8,100 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHREE RIVERS FOOD SITE INC — $6,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMARCELLUS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $6,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetDETROIT DOG RESCUE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeacon Health Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WATER STREET GLASSWORKS
  • Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KEYSTONE PLACE INC
  • Who funds KRASL ART CENTER INC
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC
  • Who funds DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES
  • Who funds Otsego Public Schools Foundation
  • Who funds MENDON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KAIROS DWELLING
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS ACADEMIC MENTORING INC
  • Who funds Benton Harbor Arts Association
  • Who funds ARS ARTS & CULTURE CENTER
  • Who funds TWIN CITY PLAYERS
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS PROMISE
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER
  • Who funds CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH COUNTY UNITED WAY
  • Who funds APPLE FARM COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS FOOD SITE INC
  • Who funds MARCELLUS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John E Fetzer Institute IncMI25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John E Fetzer Institute Inc · Berrien Community Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · The Schalon Foundation · St Joseph County United Way · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Evergreene Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Evergreene Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Evergreene Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph