Skip to content
Evelyn Job & April Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Evelyn Job & April Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$441k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$330k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$457kReligion$229kHealth$110kHuman Services$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kPublic Benefit$11kArts & Culture$8kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
  • $250k+1 grant · $330k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC$330,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CHURCH IN CHRIST SOUTH VALLEY$26,419
AMBASSADORS FOR CHIRST$20,000
OPERATION DAWN$20,000
TURNING POINT USA$10,000
MALAYSIA BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$810k · 15 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
26

Total granted

$810k
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+4%

Still filing today

67%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $430k · revenue +3%
  • AF
    AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $61k · revenue +14%
  • FL
    FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES
    4× · 2018–2023 · $15k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $70k · revenue +10%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GRACE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • PP
    PROJECT PURPLE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
3
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Saint John's Cancer Institute

To support research and development of, and education in, the basic and clinical sciences for the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Paly Interdisciplinary Experience. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
16/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $430,000 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSITY INCPALO ALTO PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $25,000 · EducationPALO ALTO PARTNERS IN EDUCATION+2 more: $1,750 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $103,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH IN CHRIST SOUTH VALLEY: $67,829 · OtherCHURCH IN CHRIST SOUTH VALLEYCHINESE CHURCH IN CHRIST-SOUTH VALLEY: $65,094 · OtherCHINESE CHURCH IN CHRIST-SOUTH V…TURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 · Other+21 more: $31,125 · Other+21 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $70,181 · HealthAmerican Hear…OPERATION DAWN: $20,000 · HealthOPERATION DAW…FRIENDS OF GRACE: $10,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF GR…PROJECT PURPLE INC: $10,000 · HealthPROJECT PURPL…SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $5,450 · Health+3 more: $1,100 · HealthAMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $61,000 · ReligionT K & TRUE LIGHT MINISTRY: $6,000 · ReligionCHINESE CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC: $4,000 · ReligionNORTH AMERICA CONSERVATIVE REVIEW: $3,000 · ReligionFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $14,000 · Human ServicesCanopy: $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Education$456,750Other$277,048Health$116,731Religion$74,000Human Services$29,000Environment$2,500Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $430,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $70,181 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALO ALTO PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION DAWN: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GRACE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT PURPLE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetT K & TRUE LIGHT MINISTRY: $6,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $5,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH AMERICA CONSERVATIVE REVIEW: $3,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCanopy: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBETHEL RENEWAL CENTER A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPALY Interdisciplinary Experience: $1,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGICAL BRIDGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pysf Family FoundationCherith Christian Pri…AbbVie FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …
Pysf Family FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pysf Family Foundation · Cherith Christian Private Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evelyn Job & April Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evelyn Job & April Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evelyn Job & April’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home