Skip to content

· Private foundation

Evans Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$307kReligion$75kAnimals$67kCrime & Legal$66kEducation$54kHuman Services$44kPhilanthropy$38kFood & Nutrition$33kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Poncan Theater Foundation$20,000
Northern Oklahoma Humane Society$10,000
The Mission$10,000
Ponca City Foundation for Progress$8,000
Survivor Resource Network$8,000
New Emergency Resource Agency$8,000
Dearing House Inc$6,000
Marland Estate Foundation$5,000
Marland's Place Foster Service$5,000
NOC Foundation$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $2k → 15%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME: $16k → 14%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME: $6k → 14%MARLAND'S CHILDREN HOME: $5k → 14%MARLAND'S CHILDREN HOME: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$611k · 29 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$611k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-4%

Still filing today

38%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    Marland Estate Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +224%
  • TM
    The Mission
    5× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +54%
  • DF
    DILLINGHAM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • GE
    GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
  • PT
    PONCAN THEATRE
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • CD
    Child Development Center Ponca City Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Preservation Oklahoma Inc

To preserve the places where Oklahoma history lives.

—
2
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Claremore Museum of History Inc

To preserve the history of Claremore, Oklahoma

Arts & Culture
4
Will Rogers Memorial Foundation

Support Will Rogers Memorial Museums

Philanthropy
5
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
6
Oklahoma Route 66 Association Inc

To celebrate and preserve Route 66 in Oklahoma through education, promotion, and advocacy, ensuring the future of the Mother Road while honoring its community and history.

Arts & Culture
7
Tulsa Foundation for Architecture

Tulsa Foundation for Architecture champions the art of good design and celebrates Oklahoma's architectural heritage through education, advocacy and archives.

Public Benefit
8
Plains Indians and Pioneers Historical Foundation

Preserve the historical heritage of people living in the 50 mile radius of woodward, oklahoma for the publics benefit.

Arts & Culture
9
Nowata County Historical Society Inc

To educate the local community about the history of Nowata County through the use of a local Museum and a Historical Residence.

—
10
Okmulgee County Homeless Shelter Inc

To promote the welfare of okmulgee county by providing temporary shelter and food for homeless and destitute persons

Human Services
11
Southwest Historical Foundation

To preserve and protect museum artifacts of the south central area of oklahoma

Arts & Culture
12
Missing and Murdered Indigenous People Central Oklahoma Chapter
Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Hall of Fame; the most unlike its peers is Dillingham Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Poncan Theater Foundation: $100,000 · OtherPoncan Theater FoundationGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $75,000 · OtherGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCHPONCAN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $43,000 · OtherPONCAN THEATRE FOUNDATION INCThe Mission: $32,000 · OtherThe MissionNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $31,500 · OtherNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INCDILLINGHAM FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherDILLINGHAM FOUNDATIONNORTHERN OKLA HUMANE SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherNORTHERN OKLA HUMANE SOCIETYSURVIVOR RESOURCE NETWORK: $28,000 · OtherNOC FOUNDATION: $24,000 · OtherVFW: $24,000 · Other+25 more: $143,513 · Other+25 moreMarland Estate Foundation: $58,000 · Arts & CultureMarland Es…FRIENDS OF MARLAND'S GRAND HOME: $9,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF…+4 more: $4,100 · Arts & Culture+4 moreNORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $37,000 · AnimalsMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesGREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesDearing House Inc: $26,000 · Youth DevelopmentOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $6,500 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthChild Development Center Ponca City Inc: $5,000 · Education
Other$561,013Arts & Culture$71,600Animals$37,000Human Services$33,500Youth Development$26,000Health$6,550Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarland Estate Foundation: $58,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetNORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $37,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetThe Mission: $32,000 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $32,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $31,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetDILLINGHAM FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetSURVIVOR RESOURCE NETWORK: $28,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetDearing House Inc: $26,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetPONCA CITY ART ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChild Development Center Ponca City Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPEACHTREE LANDING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOKLAHOMANS FOR THE ARTS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBY WESTERN HANDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWES WELKER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYELLOWSTONE RECREATIONS FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marland Estate Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Mission ↗
  • Who funds MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds DILLINGHAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SURVIVOR RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Dearing House Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MARLAND'S GRAND HOME ↗
  • Who funds PONCA CITY ART ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Child Development Center Ponca City Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEACHTREE LANDING INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMANS FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BY WESTERN HANDS ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds WES WELKER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Glenn W Peel FoundationOK20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Glenn W Peel Foundation · Keeler-Matthews Charitable Foundation Inc · Madalynne L Peel Foundation · Renfro Family Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evans Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evans Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Survivor Resource Network: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evans Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Evans Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evans Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph