Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eugene and Pauline Hall Little Flock Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$54kEducation$21kHousing & Shelter$17kHealth$11kYouth Development$7kFood & Nutrition$5kReligion$4kAnimals$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$278k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ark crisis center$3,000
Santa clothes club$3,000
House of bread and peace$2,000
TRI STATE FOOD BANK$2,000
RESCUE MISSION$2,000
Aurora$1,000
Salvation Army$1,000
It takes a village$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%House of bread and peace: $2k → 15%SWIRCA: $2k → 15%SWIRCA: $2k → 15%SWIRCA: $2k → 15%AUROA INC: $1k → 15%AURORA: $1k → 15%Aurora: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 10 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
21

Total granted

$63k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+5%

Still filing today

60%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +126%
  • SI
    SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +11%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • SC
    SANTA'S CLOTHES CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • EK
    Eastern Kentucky University
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
2
Lighthouse for the Homeless

The only free day shelter in the area comprised of a collection of community agencies and service providers, all focused on a single mission: ending homelessness in tarrant county.

Human Services
3
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…

Food & Nutrition
4
Goodwill Industries of the Valleys Inc

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Employment
5
Vancouver St Vincent DePaul Society Conference

Inspired by the Gospel values of charity and compassion for all, and in an effort to promote human dignity, the Vancouver Conference of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul provides food, clothing, shelter and other forms of assistance to…

—
6
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
7
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
8
Gospel Inc

To develop community with the formerly homeless. to offer services to the formerly homeless regardless of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or religious affiliation. to share the love of god with all people we come into contact with.

Human Services
9
Advent House Ministries Inc

To provide a ministry in the form of services to the poor and disadvantaged people of the lansing area.

—
10
Simon House Inc

The organization's mission is to reduce the extent and consequences of homelessness in franklin and surrounding counties. this is accomplished by providing two low-barrier shelters that accommodate homeless men, women, and children.…

—
11
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
12
Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc

Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Santa Clothes Club Inc: $20,000 · OtherSanta Clothes Club IncARK CRISIS CHILDRENS CENTER: $9,000 · OtherARK CRISIS CHILDRENS CENTEREVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $8,000 · OtherEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INCSANTA'S CLOTHES CLUB: $6,000 · OtherSANTA'S CLOTHES CLUBSALVATION ARMY: $5,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIT TAKES A VILLAGE: $4,000 · OtherJUVINILE DIABETIES ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · OtherEastern Kentucky University: $3,000 · OtherArk crisis center: $3,000 · Other+20 more: $27,000 · Other+20 moreTaylor University: $18,000 · EducationTaylor Universit…SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE: $6,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST…AURORA INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesAURORA IN…HOUSE OF BREAD AND PEACE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF …SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 · ReligionCONVOY OF HOPE: $2,500 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthABLEVOICES: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$89,000Education$18,000Human Services$11,000Religion$2,500International$2,500Health$2,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSanta Clothes Club Inc: $20,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTaylor University: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetABLEVOICES: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Santa Clothes Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds Taylor University ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE ↗
  • Who funds AURORA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF BREAD AND PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ABLEVOICES ↗
  • Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Koch Foundation IncIN22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Koch Foundation Inc · Gerling Family Foundation Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Edward Love Foundation · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Elizabeth Albon Foundation Trust · The Aline and Edgar Igleheart Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eugene and Pauline Hall Little Flock Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eugene and Pauline Hall Little Flock Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eugene and Pauline Hall Little Flock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph