Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eugene and Janet Lerner Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.6MHealth$1.1MInternational$1.1MRecreation & Sports$510kReligion$269kArts & Culture$245kYouth Development$132kEducation$118kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $311k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $524k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND$275,000
KESHET$112,500
FRIENDS OF ELNET$100,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$100,000
ANRA (ADVANCES IN NEUROBLASTOMA RESEARCH ASSN)$60,000
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND$51,000
OPENDORMEDIA$50,000
OLIN SANG RUBY UNION INSTITUTE CAMP$50,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$40,000
ST BALDRICKS FOUNDATION$30,000
JUDD GOLDMAN ADOPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION$25,000
LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS$20,000
SOCIAL GOOD FUND$20,000
CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION$15,000
CAL POLY FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 50 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
20

Total granted

$4.8M
$266k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+52%

Still filing today

62%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +13%
  • K
    KESHET
    5× · 2020–2024 · $388k · revenue +53%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $340k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IP
    ISRAEL PARASPORT CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • AI
    ADVANCES IN NEUROBLASTOMA RESEARCH
    one grant, 2020 · $34k
  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
6
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
9
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
10
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
12
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Education Resource Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
38/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KESHET: $387,500 · OtherKESHETISRAEL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLES: $300,000 · OtherISRAEL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLESISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $243,000 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCOLIN SANG RUBY UNION INSTITUTE CAMP: $131,800 · OtherOLIN SANG RUBY UNION INSTITUTE CAMPARZA: $100,000 · OtherISRAEL PARASPORT CENTER: $100,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE IDF: $74,000 · OtherJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $95,000 · Other+36 more: $770,323 · Other+36 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,270,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLI…JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $135,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLIT…ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $15,000 · PhilanthropyBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $340,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL F…FRIENDS OF ELNET: $320,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ELNETNEW ISRAEL FUND: $192,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $80,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUN…+3 more: $45,000 · InternationalCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $105,000 · HealthADVANCES IN NEUROBLASTOMA RESEARCH ASSOC C/O GARRETT BRODEUR MD CHOP: $90,000 · HealthLEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $80,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $40,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $30,000 · HealthUMRC-PORTER HILLS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthHUMAN CONNECTIONS: $65,000 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $52,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $25,000 · Arts & CultureRivendell Theatre Ensemble: $21,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $60,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $20,000 · EducationPROJECT 613 NFP: $15,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $135,000 · Religion+3 more: $7,500 · Religion
Other$2,201,623Philanthropy$1,540,000International$977,000Health$370,000Arts & Culture$183,000Education$175,000Religion$142,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,270,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKESHET: $387,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $340,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $320,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $243,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $192,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $135,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $135,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetADVANCES IN NEUROBLASTOMA RESEARCH ASSOC C/O GARRETT BRODEUR MD CHOP: $90,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetLEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $80,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN CONNECTIONS: $65,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $52,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE WORLDWIDE LTD: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation: $28,441 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUMRC-PORTER HILLS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDESERT LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetRivendell Theatre Ensemble: $21,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetBET TZEDEK: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT 613 NFP: $15,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH POCET: $10,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetDIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Blues Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBayit Brigade: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER ACTION LOS ANGELES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCES IN NEUROBLASTOMA RESEARCH ASSOC C/O GARRETT BRODEUR MD CHOP ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE WORLDWIDE LTD ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds UMRC-PORTER HILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DESERT LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Gondeck Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eugene and Janet Lerner Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eugene and Janet Lerner Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eugene and Janet Lerner Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Eugene and Janet Lerner Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eugene and Janet Lerner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph