Skip to content

· Private foundation

Estell Alexander Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$330kReligion$233kHuman Services$140kAnimals$93kArts & Culture$92kEducation$91kCommunity Improvement$62kCrime & Legal$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE STRAZ CENTER$25,000
ACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMES$25,000
ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
THE BAY AREA POLICE CHIEF'S FOUNDAT$10,000
HANDS ACCROSS THE BAY$10,000
PHOENIX HOUSE FLORIDA$5,250
HOMELESSNESS EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM$2,691
STARTING RIGHT NOW$1,200
COFFEE UNITING PEOPLE$1,000
GLAZER CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$259
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CENTRE FOR WOMEN: $3k → 13%JULIE WEINTRAUBS HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $28k → 12%HANDS ACROSS THE BAY: $25k → 12%JULIE WEINTRAUBS HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $25k → 12%HANDS ACROSS THE BAY: $20k → 12%HANDS ACROSS THE BAY: $15k → 12%A KID'S PLACE: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Estell Alexander Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Estell Alexander Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$930k · 14 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +110% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
26

Total granted

$930k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
+52%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $249k · revenue +994%
  • JW
    JULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $113k · revenue +91%
  • TAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +23%
  • TB
    TAMPA BAY AREA CHIEFS OF POLICE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • JH
    JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL OF TAMPA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
2
Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—
3
The Arc Tampa Bay Foundation Inc

To secure the financial future of services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities served by the arc tampa bay, inc. (continued on schedule o)this mission is accomplished through a comprehensive plan of building…

Human Services
4
The Family Healthcare Foundation Inc

The family healthcare foundation's mission is to be the trusted leader in our community, ensuring access to high-quality healthcare for all in the tampa bay area. see also schedule o.

Health
5
Keep Tampa Bay Beautiful

To promote a culture of environmental stewardship through volunteer and educational opportunities.

Environment
6
Heart Gallery of Tampa Inc

Through photographic exhibits, the Heart Gallery of Tampa introduces our community to foster children awaiting adoptive families. We provide a platform to inspire our community to improve their quality of life and connect them with Forever…

Human Services
7
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
—
8
Florida Health Sciences Center Inc

As the region's leading safety net hospital, tampa general hospital is committed to providing area residents with excellent and compassionate health care ranging from the simplest to the most complex medical services. our shared purpose:…

Health
9
Tampa General Hospital Foundation Inc

The tampa general hospital foundation exclusively operates for the purpose of raising funds to support the research, education and service mission of florida health sciences center, inc. dba tampa general hospital. tampa general is a 981…

Health
10
Tampa Hillsborough Homeless Initiative Inc

Our purpose is to lead the continuum of care in collaboration with agencies in order to develop and provide innovative solutions to reduce and end homlessness in tampa-hillsborough county.

Human Services
11
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
12
Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc

Our mission is to generate social and economic impact throughout the tampa bay region by attracting, promoting and/or organizing youth and amateur sporting events and initiatives.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Westchase Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
18/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMES OF FLORIDA INC: $100,000 · OtherACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMES OF FLORIDA INCACADEMY OF HOLY NAMES: $88,000 · OtherACADEMY OF HOLY NAMESTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $67,000 · OtherTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INCHANDS ACCROSS THE BAY: $60,747 · OtherHANDS ACCROSS THE BAYJESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $53,000 · OtherJESUIT HIGH SCHOOLACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMES: $25,000 · OtherSTRAZ PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $25,000 · OtherGRACE FAMILY CHURCH: $22,500 · OtherTHE BAY AREA POLICE CHIEF'S FOUNDAT: $20,100 · Other+19 more: $81,644 · Other+19 moreST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC: $248,693 · HealthST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOU…THE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC: $50,000 · HealthTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY IN…NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDAT…+3 more: $4,350 · HealthJULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $112,522 · Human ServicesJULIE WEINTR…A KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,064 · Human ServicesTampa Bay Humane Society Foundation Inc: $78,000 · AnimalsTampa Bay…Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsHumane So…The Florida Aquarium Inc: $5,000 · AnimalsThe Flori…TRIBE- SEMINOLE HEIGHTS: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC: $1,544 · ReligionMIKE EVANS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $300 · Philanthropy
Other$542,991Health$323,043Human Services$122,586Animals$93,000Youth Development$11,000Religion$1,544Philanthropy$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC: $248,693 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetJULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $112,522 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $67,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRIBE- SEMINOLE HEIGHTS: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetThe Florida Aquarium Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $2,850 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC: $2,564 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTRE FOR WOMEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTARTING RIGHT NOW: $2,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC: $1,544 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKE EVANS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Tampa Bay Humane Society Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRIBE- SEMINOLE HEIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds The Florida Aquarium Inc ↗
  • Who funds A KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds STARTING RIGHT NOW ↗
  • Who funds Westchase Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Debartolo Family Foundation IncFL28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Sbj Resch Family Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · New York Yankees Tampa Foundation Inc · Frank E Duckwall Foundation · The Spurlino Foundation · Lightning Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Estell Alexander Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Estell Alexander Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Centre for Women Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Florida Aquarium Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Estell Alexander Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Estell Alexander Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Estell Alexander’s filings →

More from the funding graph