Skip to content
Est Foundation Co Hoogendoorn & Talbot LLP at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Est Foundation Co Hoogendoorn & Talbot LLP

To provide support of urban nonpublic education and other causes as determined by the board

$573k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$366k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.9MHealth$792kInternational$703kEducation$21kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $204k
  • $250k+1 grant · $366k
$82,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CWSCS$366,000
Our Serb Charti$82,000
Cleveland Clinic$62,280
City of Hope$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST JUDE: $5k → 17%CWSCS: $366k → 14%CWSCS: $329k → 14%CWSCS: $206k → 14%CWSCS: $199k → 14%CWSCS: $190k → 14%CWSCS: $181k → 14%CWSCS: $147k → 14%CWSCS: $129k → 14%CWSCS: $129k → 14%PROJECT CURE CHG: $13k → 14%CHICAGO HOUSE: $5k → 14%NW THORCIC ONCOL: $11k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $57k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $55k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $52k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $45k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $42k → 14%Natl Public Hous: $5k → 14%KOHL CHILDRENS M: $2k → 14%Our Serb Charti: $108k → 14%Our Serb Charti: $82k → 14%Our Serb Charti: $81k → 14%OUR SERB CHARTIA: $80k → 14%OUR SERB CHARTIA: $80k → 14%OUR SERB CHARTIA: $80k → 14%Our Serb Charti: $71k → 14%OUR SERB CHARTIA: $60k → 14%OUR SERB CHARTIA: $60k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 6 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$3.4M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+64%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OUR SERBS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $703k · revenue +35% · 92% of their budget
  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $76k · revenue +62%
  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2021–2022 · $19k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +20%
  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
3
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National Public Housing Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CWSCS: $1,876,205 · OtherCWSCSCleveland Clinic: $205,200 · OtherCleveland Clinic+1 more: $10,800 · OtherOUR SERBS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $702,601 · PhilanthropyOUR SERBS CHARITABLE OR…CITY OF HOPE: $482,354 · HealthCITY OF HOPETHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $76,400 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINI…+3 more: $22,500 · HealthNorthwestern University: $18,500 · Recreation & SportsThe National Public Housing Museum: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKOHL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,092,205Philanthropy$702,601Health$581,254Recreation & Sports$18,500Arts & Culture$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUR SERBS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $702,601 over 9y, 92% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $482,354 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $76,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $18,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HOUSE & SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe National Public Housing Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOHL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Chicago Community TrustIL12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Est Foundation Co Hoogendoorn & Talbot LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Est Foundation Co Hoogendoorn & Talbot LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Est Foundation Co Hoogendoorn & Talbot LLP’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home