Skip to content

· Public charity

Eskolta School Research and Design Inc

Reinventing schools, schools districts, and nonprofit agencies to develop, test, implement, and codify effective practices for innovatively engaging adolescents in school and preparing them for a meaningful career, community involvement, college success.

$217k
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Education$218kHuman Services$64kEmployment$40kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $202,343, the rows itemized in this filing. The $216,808 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,465 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK$60,000
SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES$25,000
GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES$15,000
URBAN DOVE TEAM CHARTER SCHOOLS$14,282
CATHOLIC CHARITITES COMMUNITY SERVICESE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK$13,500
NYC DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION$10,000
CAMBA INC$10,000
BRONXWORKS INC$10,000
JEREMIAH E BURKE HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
HARVEST COLLEGIATE HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
NORTH QUEENS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
HIGH SCHOOL FOR EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION$8,061
JILL CHAIFETZ TRANSFER SCHOOL$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $15k → 20%BRONXWORKS INC: $10k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Eskolta School Research and Design Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 85%.

Eskolta School Research and Design Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
2
Brooklyn Bureau of Community Service

Bcs partners with people to overcome obstacles on their pathway toward self-determination (see schedule o).

Human Services
3
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
4
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
5
St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services
6
Collaborative Solutions for Communities

To be the leading solution-focused resource in building strong, sustainable families and communities through family support services, innovative training, community capacity building, economic development and social enterprise.

Crime & Legal
7
Cardinal Mccloskey School and Home for Children

The organization strives to protect, empower and promote independence for at-risk children and families and those with developmental disabilities through quality community based services.

—
8
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
9
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
10
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
11
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
12
Jewish Community Council of Greater Coney Island Inc

To provide a comprehensive range of social services to individuals and technical assistance to nonprofit organizations across nyc.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sco Family of Services; the most unlike its peers is Boston Private Industry Council Inc the. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NYC DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: $133,668 · OtherNYC DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK: $13,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES ARCHDIOCESE OF …BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 · OtherBOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLSAdvocates for Children of New York: $60,000 · Crime & LegalAdvocates for Childr…SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $25,000 · Human ServicesSCO FAMILY OF SER…GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $15,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD SER…BRONXWORKS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INCBOSTON PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC THE: $40,000 · EmploymentBOSTON PRIVAT…URBAN DOVE TEAM CHARTER SCHOOLS: $14,282 · EducationCAMBA INC: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$157,168Crime & Legal$60,000Human Services$50,000Employment$40,000Education$14,282Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAdvocates for Children of New York: $60,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN DOVE TEAM CHARTER SCHOOLS: $14,282 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK: $13,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mother Cabrini Health Foundation IncNY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Good Plus Foundation Inc · The New York Bar Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · United Way of New York City · Food Bank for New York City · Robin Hood Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eskolta School Research and Design Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eskolta School Research and Design Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eskolta School Research and Design’s filings →

    More from the funding graph