· Public charity
Eskolta School Research and Design Inc
Reinventing schools, schools districts, and nonprofit agencies to develop, test, implement, and codify effective practices for innovatively engaging adolescents in school and preparing them for a meaningful career, community involvement, college success.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $202,343 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $216,808 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,465 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $128k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK | $60,000 |
| SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES | $25,000 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES | $15,000 |
| URBAN DOVE TEAM CHARTER SCHOOLS | $14,282 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITITES COMMUNITY SERVICESE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK | $13,500 |
| JEREMIAH E BURKE HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| HARVEST COLLEGIATE HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| NORTH QUEENS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CAMBA INC | $10,000 |
| NYC DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION | $10,000 |
| BRONXWORKS INC | $10,000 |
| HIGH SCHOOL FOR EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION | $8,061 |
| JILL CHAIFETZ TRANSFER SCHOOL | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Eskolta School Research and Design Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…
Bcs partners with people to overcome obstacles on their pathway toward self-determination (see schedule o).
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…
For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)
To be the leading solution-focused resource in building strong, sustainable families and communities through family support services, innovative training, community capacity building, economic development and social enterprise.
The organization strives to protect, empower and promote independence for at-risk children and families and those with developmental disabilities through quality community based services.
In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.
Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.
To provide a comprehensive range of social services to individuals and technical assistance to nonprofit organizations across nyc.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sco Family of Services and the most unlike its peers is Boston Private Industry Council Inc the. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Advocates for Children of New York ↗
- Who funds BOSTON PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC THE ↗
- Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
- Who funds URBAN DOVE TEAM CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CAMBA INC ↗
- Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Good Plus Foundation Inc · The New York Bar Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · United Way of New York City · Food Bank for New York City · Robin Hood Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eskolta School Research and Design Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.