Skip to content
Equitas Health Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Equitas Health Inc

Our mission is to be the gateway to good health for those at risk of or affected by hiv/aids, for the lgbtq community, and for those seeking a welcoming healthcare home.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$197kCivil Rights$117kHealth$85kReligion$62kYouth Development$53kHuman Services$51kCommunity Improvement$22kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $34,670, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,382,822 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,348,152 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$14,670
Median grant
1
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART$15,000
QUEERENCIA LLC$14,670
COMMUNITY AIDS NETWORKAKRON PRIDE INITIATIVE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Community AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initiative: $5k → 13%COMMUNITY AIDS NETWORKAKRON PRIDE INITIATIVE: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$450k · 10 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$450k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+47%

Still filing today

70%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN
    3× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +127%
  • SC
    STONEWALL COLUMBUS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $47k · revenue +130%
  • CP
    CINCINNATI PRIDE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • NW
    Nina West LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • RF
    Riddle Funeral Home
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • TU
    THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Black Pride Inc

To mobilize the Black LGBTQ+ community to promote the health, education, and awareness as well as social and cultural wellness of people living at the interaction of Black and LGBTQ+ identity.

Civil Rights
2
Capital City Pride

Capital city pride brings together members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender community, their friends, family, and supporters. we do this by producing events that inspire, educate, connect, and celebrate our diverse community and…

Human Services
3
Columbus Pride Bands

Performing arts organization

Arts & Culture
4
Gay Lesbian Bisexual & Transgend Community Center of Colorado

To engage, empower, enrich, and advance the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender community of colorado.

—
5
Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The lgbt community center of greater cleveland's mission is to advance the rights, respect and diversity of the lgbt community. the lgbt community center seeks to create a community that celebrates the inherent worth and dignity of every…

Civil Rights
6
The American Museum of Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender History & Culture

Celebrate cultures of lgbtq+ people

—
7
Capital Pride Alliance Inc

The capital pride alliance, inc. (capital pride), through its diverse planning and stewardship of the lgbtq+ organizations and events, specifically year-round pride festivities and programs in washington dc, will serve to celebrate,…

Human Services
8
Capital District Gay and Lesbian Community Council Inc

To develop, support, and preserve the well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer community.

Civil Rights
9
Cr Pride

CR Pride creates events and opportunities for awareness, inclusivity and visibility of LGBTQIA+ individuals within the community. CR Pride is best known for producing Pride Fest, a gathering that highlights entertainment, education,…

Human Services
10
Our Pride Encompasses Nashville

The mission of Nashville Pride is to promote a sense of community within the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender population in Middle Tennessee by producing a public festival each June, in addition to related events throughout the year.

Arts & Culture
11
Dayton Gay Mens Chorus

Community chorus

Arts & Culture
12
Stonewall Pride I Inc

Providing resources for cultural events

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Pride Inc; the most unlike its peers is National African American. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STONEWALL COLUMBUS INC: $46,912 · OtherSTONEWALL COLUMBUS INCQueerencia LLC: $45,552 · OtherQueerencia LLCFIRST GRACE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $41,925 · OtherFIRST GRACE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTNina West LLC: $25,000 · OtherNina West LLCMURRAY CONSULTING GROUP LLC: $22,000 · OtherMURRAY CONSULTING GROUP LLCRiddle Funeral Home: $14,000 · OtherRiddle Funeral HomeTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13,200 · OtherCREATIVE FLOATS: $12,200 · OtherELEGANT QUEEN: $10,300 · OtherSUPPORTING PRIDE ACROSS RURAL COMMUNITIES: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $18,650 · Other+3 moreCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART: $140,000 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ARTCOLUMBUS GAY MEN'S CHOIR: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS GAY MEN'S CHOIRFRANKLINTON ARTS DISTRICT: $6,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN: $75,000 · HealthNATIONAL AFRIC…CINCINNATI PRIDE INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesCommunity AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initi: $10,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $23,963 · Civil RightsEquality Ohio Education Fund: $10,000 · Civil RightsSHORT NORTH ALLIANCE: $18,750 · Community ImprovementSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $10,000 · EducationKaleidoscope Youth Center Inc: $7,000 · Youth Development
Other$259,739Arts & Culture$156,000Health$75,000Human Services$36,000Civil Rights$33,963Community Improvement$18,750Education$10,000Youth Development$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART: $140,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN: $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSTONEWALL COLUMBUS INC: $46,912 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCINCINNATI PRIDE INC: $26,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $23,963 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHORT NORTH ALLIANCE: $18,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initi: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOLUMBUS GAY MEN'S CHOIR: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEquality Ohio Education Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKaleidoscope Youth Center Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRANKLINTON ARTS DISTRICT: $6,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN ↗
  • Who funds STONEWALL COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI PRIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHORT NORTH ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Community AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initi ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS GAY MEN'S CHOIR ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Equality Ohio Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds Kaleidoscope Youth Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLINTON ARTS DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON GAY & LESBIAN CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

L Brands FoundationColumbus FoundationUnited Way of Central…Nisource Charitable F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
L Brands FoundationOH17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: L Brands Foundation · Columbus Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Equitas Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Equitas Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Equitas Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home