Loading…
· Public charity
EQUITAS HEALTH INC
Our mission is to be the gateway to good health for those at risk of or affected by hiv/aids, for the lgbtq community, and for those seeking a welcoming healthcare home.
$1.9M
Granted FY2023
10
Grants
2
Communities
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0160% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2023.
Arts & Culture$121kHealth$75kCivil Rights$34kHuman Services$21kCommunity Improvement$19kEducation$10kYouth Development$7kOther$190k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
—
2022
chorusacceptancefranklintonartsequalityshort northgay
2023
artsshort north
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k4 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$67M
Total assets
Largest grants
- AFRICAN AMERICAN MALE WELLNESS WALK$30,000
- COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART$27,500
- FIRST GRACE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$20,225
- CREATIVE FLOATS$12,200
- MURRAY CONSULTING GROUP LLC$12,000
- ELEGANT QUEEN$10,300
- SHORT NORTH ALLIANCE$9,250
- CINCINNATI PRIDE$8,500
- HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN$6,916
- STONEWALL COLUMBUS$5,737
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 93% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$349k · 8 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
10
Total granted
$349k
$106k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+81%
+219%
Still filing today
75%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Arts & CultureCivil RightsHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMColumbus Museum of Art3× · 2021–2023 · $105k · revenue +38%
- AAAfrican American Male Wellness Walk3× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +1248%
- HRHuman Rights Campaign2× · 2022–2023 · $24k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- NWNina West LLCone grant, 2021 · $25k
- RFRiddle Funeral Homeone grant, 2022 · $14k
- EOEquality Ohio Education Fundone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Cleveland Museum of Art
To provide a collection of artwork representing achievement of individuals and civilizations, past and present, for the benefit of the public.
Arts & Culture
2
Columbus Pride Bands
Performing arts organization
Arts & Culture
3
Cincinnati Black Pride Inc
To mobilize the Black LGBTQ+ community to promote the health, education, and awareness as well as social and cultural wellness of people living at the interaction of Black and LGBTQ+ identity.
Civil Rights
4
Glaad Inc
As the world's largest lgbtq media advocacy organization, glaad ensures fair, accurate, and inclusive representation that leads to 100% acceptance.
—
5
Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender
The lgbt community center of greater cleveland's mission is to advance the rights, respect and diversity of the lgbt community. the lgbt community center seeks to create a community that celebrates the inherent worth and dignity of every…
Civil Rights
6
Equality Ohio
Equality Ohio identifies and transforms systems and institutions so LGBTQ+ Ohioans can fully access legal and lived equality. We envision an Ohio where peope are welcome,
Civil Rights
7
The Gala Pride and Diversity Center
The gay and lesbian alliance of the central coast supports and empowers people of all sexual orientations, gender identities, and expressions to strengthen and unite our central coast community.
Unclassified
8
Our Pride Encompasses Nashville
The mission of Nashville Pride is to promote a sense of community within the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender population in Middle Tennessee by producing a public festival each June, in addition to related events throughout the year.
Arts & Culture
9
Dayton Gay Mens Chorus
Community chorus
Arts & Culture
10
Roy G Biv Emerging Artists Inc
Roy G Biv is a nonprofit art gallery located in the historic short north neighborhood of Columbus, Ohio. Founded in 1989, Roy G Biv is known for presenting innovative contemporary art by emerging artists from around the world.
Arts & Culture
11
Capital City Pride
Create events and safe spaces for the lgbtqia+ community
Human Services
12
Portland Gay Men's Chorus
Education through choral performances-the portland gay men's chorus aspires to expand, redefine, and perfect the choral art through eclectic performances that honor and uplift our community and affirm the worth of all people.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Pride Inc and the most unlike its peers is Franklinton Arts District. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$190,487Arts & Culture$121,000Health$75,000Civil Rights$33,963Human Services$21,000Community Improvement$18,750Education$10,000Youth Development$7,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Columbus Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds African American Male Wellness Walk ↗
- Who funds Stonewall Columbus ↗
- Who funds Human Rights Campaign ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Pride ↗
- Who funds Short North Alliance ↗
- Who funds Equality Ohio Education Fund ↗
- Who funds Social Good Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds Columbus Gay Men's Chorus ↗
- Who funds Kaleidoscope Youth Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Franklinton Arts District ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
L Brands FoundationOH20.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: L Brands Foundation · Columbus Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Greater Columbus Arts Council · Encova Foundation of Ohio · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation EQUITAS HEALTH INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Columbus Gay Men's Chorus.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +83% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 311306169 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Columbus Gay Men's Chorus, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Equitas Health Inc?
Find your warmest path to Equitas Health Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines