Skip to content
Enpro Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Enpro Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$477k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$323kHealth$290kEducation$228kYouth Development$223kHousing & Shelter$114kPublic Safety & Disaster$110kRecreation & Sports$81kCrime & Legal$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $468k
$13,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$600k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gills Creek Watershed Association$17,000
Friends of Zoo Boise$16,000
Idaho Diaper Bank$16,000
The Neighborhood Center of West Volusia$16,000
Girls on the Run of Greater Rochester$15,000
Lupine Community School$15,000
Inheritance of Hope$15,000
East Texas Area Council BSA$14,000
Rachel's Bags of Love Inc$14,000
Cure Sanfilippo Foundation$14,000
Live Oak Home & School Club$13,000
Fostering Kindness Corp$13,000
Tooling & Manufacturing Association$13,000
My Brother's Table$13,000
Perinatal Network of Monroe Co$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Family Promise of Northern New Castle County: $16k → 10%Community Child Care Council Sonoma County: $14k → 9%Center for Youth Services: $10k → 14%Compassion United Inc: $10k → 9%The Neighborhood Center of West Volusia: $20k → 12%Children's Home Society of North Carolina: $14k → 10%Palmyra Community Center: $12k → 11%The Neighborhood Center of West Volusia: $16k → 12%Arc of Volusia: $12k → 12%Idaho Diaper Bank: $16k → 8%The Arc of Volusia: $11k → 12%Idaho Diaper Bank: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
KY
DE
AZ
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Enpro Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Enpro Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 27 repeat orgs$603k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
22

Total granted

$1.1M
$352k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+7%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BakerRipley
    4× · 2020–2023 · $65k · revenue +16%
  • TL
    THE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $63k · revenue +23%
  • FK
    Fostering Kindness Corp
    3× · 2023–2025 · $54k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • ER
    E4E RELIEF LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +74%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • CI
    Communities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue -62%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big BrothersBig Sisters of Wnc Inc

Match mentoring volunteers with children in need to build and foster relationships.

—
2
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
4
Inclusive Communities Project

Promote fair and affordable housing for low income families, free from the vestiges of segregation and discrimination.

Housing & Shelter
5
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
6
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
7
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
8
Partners with Families and Children Spokane

Our mission is to prevent, interrupt and repair cycles of abuse and neglect within families.Our vision is safe children, healthy families, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
9
Family Connects International

Family connects international is committed to strengthening bonds for families of newborns and linking them directly to supportive community care resources.

Health
10
Healing to You

Healing to you provides mobile medical and mental health services to adults and children impacted by domestic violence and sexual assault. our goal is to close the gap in access to healthcare services to promote well being and heal the…

Health
11
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
12
Family & Children's Services of Mid-Michigan Inc

We inspire hope and well-being for people of all ages by providing counseling, education and support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tooling and Manufacturing Association Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
22/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $84,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEast Texas Area Council BSA: $44,000 · OtherEast Texas Area Council BSAFlorence Crittenton Services dba Crittenton: $37,000 · OtherFriends of Zoo Boise: $31,000 · OtherGiGi's Playhouse Inc: $30,000 · OtherLEYDEN TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC: $27,000 · OtherBreast Cancer Coalition: $27,000 · OtherGROW BY DESIGN: $25,000 · OtherLIVE OAK HOME & SCHOOL CLUB: $25,000 · OtherNEIGHBORWORKS BOISE: $42,000 · OtherNEIGHBORWORKS BOISETOOLING AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Other+26 more: $327,000 · Other+26 moreBakerRipley: $65,000 · Human ServicesBakerRipleyNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD CEN…IDAHO DIAPER BANK INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO DIAPER BAN…THE ARC OF VOLUSIA INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF VOLUS…FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY: $16,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE O…Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc: $14,000 · Human ServicesChildren's Home …Community Child Care Council of Sonoma County: $14,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Child …FOSTER AND HEART: $13,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER AND HEARTPalmyra Community Center: $12,000 · Human ServicesCompassion United: $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Center for Youth Services Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $63,000 · EducationTHE LEGACY PRO…INSPIREDU INC: $45,000 · EducationINSPIREDU INCHeart Math Tutoring Inc: $41,000 · EducationHeart Math Tut…Communities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc: $18,000 · EducationCommunities In…GIRLS ON THE RUN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $15,000 · EducationGIRLS ON THE R…LUPINE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationLUPINE COMMUNI…LeTourneau University: $13,000 · EducationLeTourneau Uni…Cure Sanfilippo Foundation: $52,000 · HealthCure Sanfil…Dilworth Center for Chemical Dependency: $35,000 · HealthDilworth Ce…Breast Cancer Coalition of Rochester Inc: $21,000 · HealthBreast Canc…SURGERY ON SUNDAY INC: $15,000 · HealthSURGERY ON …INHERITANCE OF HOPE INC: $15,000 · HealthINHERITANCE…PERINATAL NETWORK OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $13,000 · HealthPERINATAL N…+2 more: $10,000 · Health+2 moreFreedom School Partners Inc: $78,000 · Youth DevelopmentFreedom S…Fostering Kindness Corp: $54,000 · Youth DevelopmentFostering…E4E RELIEF LLC: $100,000 · Public Safety & DisasterKIDS AGAINST HUNGER BAY AREA: $11,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $44,000 · Civil RightsDRESS FOR SUCCESS SAN FRANCISCO: $30,000 · Civil Rights
Other$727,000Human Services$240,000Education$210,000Health$161,000Youth Development$132,000Public Safety & Disaster$111,000Civil Rights$74,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetE4E RELIEF LLC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFreedom School Partners Inc: $78,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBakerRipley: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $63,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFostering Kindness Corp: $54,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $52,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetINSPIREDU INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $44,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORWORKS BOISE: $42,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHeart Math Tutoring Inc: $41,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC: $36,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDilworth Center for Chemical Dependency: $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS SAN FRANCISCO: $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTOOLING AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetIDAHO DIAPER BANK INC: $27,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY: $23,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF VOLUSIA INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBreast Cancer Coalition of Rochester Inc: $21,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCommunities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILLS CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $17,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY: $16,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSURGERY ON SUNDAY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetLUPINE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $15,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetINHERITANCE OF HOPE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Home Society of North Carolina Inc: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Child Care Council of Sonoma County: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERINATAL NETWORK OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLeTourneau University: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY BROTHER'S TABLE INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOSTER AND HEART: $13,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF PARTNERS IN PREVENTION: $13,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetPalmyra Community Center: $12,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHEARTISANS MARKETPLACE: $11,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKIDS AGAINST HUNGER BAY AREA: $11,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBARRIO DOGS INC: $11,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetEDWARD BOSS PRADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center for Youth Services Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEagle Mount: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEARTS FOR HEARTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 66% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Commun…United Way of Greater…Albemarle FoundationGreater Rochester Hea…The Leon Levine Found…Equitable Foundation …Pwc Foundation IncAmerican Gift FundGreater Houston Commu…Shell USA Company Fou…Charities Aid Foundat…Chubb Charitable Foun…
Rochester Area Community FoundationNY15.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Chubb Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enpro Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enpro Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 73%
  • Family Promise of Northern New Castle County: 73% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Center of West Volusia Inc: 27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Enpro Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Enpro Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Enpro’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home