Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Enpro Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$477k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$323kHealth$290kEducation$228kYouth Development$223kHousing & Shelter$114kPublic Safety & Disaster$110kRecreation & Sports$81kCrime & Legal$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $468k
$13,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$600k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gills Creek Watershed Association$17,000
Friends of Zoo Boise$16,000
Idaho Diaper Bank$16,000
The Neighborhood Center of West Volusia$16,000
Girls on the Run of Greater Rochester$15,000
Inheritance of Hope$15,000
Lupine Community School$15,000
East Texas Area Council BSA$14,000
Cure Sanfilippo Foundation$14,000
Rachel's Bags of Love Inc$14,000
Perinatal Network of Monroe Co$13,000
My Brother's Table$13,000
Friends of Partners in Prevention$13,000
LeTourneau University$13,000
Fostering Kindness Corp$13,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Family Promise of Northern New Castle County: $16k → 10%Community Child Care Council Sonoma County: $14k → 9%Center for Youth Services: $10k → 14%Compassion United Inc: $10k → 9%The Neighborhood Center of West Volusia: $20k → 12%Children's Home Society of North Carolina: $14k → 10%Palmyra Community Center: $12k → 11%The Neighborhood Center of West Volusia: $16k → 12%Arc of Volusia: $12k → 12%Idaho Diaper Bank: $16k → 8%The Arc of Volusia: $11k → 12%Idaho Diaper Bank: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
KY
DE
AZ
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Enpro Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Enpro Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 27 repeat orgs$603k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
22

Total granted

$1.1M
$352k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+7%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BakerRipley
    4× · 2020–2023 · $65k · revenue +16%
  • TL
    THE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $63k · revenue +23%
  • FK
    Fostering Kindness Corp
    3× · 2023–2025 · $54k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • ER
    E4E RELIEF LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +74%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • CI
    Communities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue -62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big BrothersBig Sisters of Wnc Inc

Match mentoring volunteers with children in need to build and foster relationships.

2
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
4
Inclusive Communities Project

Promote fair and affordable housing for low income families, free from the vestiges of segregation and discrimination.

Housing & Shelter
5
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
6
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
7
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
8
Partners with Families and Children Spokane

Our mission is to prevent, interrupt and repair cycles of abuse and neglect within families.Our vision is safe children, healthy families, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
9
Family Connects International

Family connects international is committed to strengthening bonds for families of newborns and linking them directly to supportive community care resources.

Health
10
Healing to You

Healing to you provides mobile medical and mental health services to adults and children impacted by domestic violence and sexual assault. our goal is to close the gap in access to healthcare services to promote well being and heal the…

Health
11
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
12
Family & Children's Services of Mid-Michigan Inc

We inspire hope and well-being for people of all ages by providing counseling, education and support.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tooling and Manufacturing Association Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesCommunity Food PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Development ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsAddiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Independent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%13%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%15%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/54
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,511

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
25/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $84,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEast Texas Area Council BSA — $44,000 · OtherEast Texas Area Council BSAFlorence Crittenton Services dba Crittenton — $37,000 · OtherFriends of Zoo Boise — $31,000 · OtherGiGi's Playhouse Inc — $30,000 · OtherLEYDEN TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC — $27,000 · OtherBreast Cancer Coalition — $27,000 · OtherLIVE OAK HOME & SCHOOL CLUB — $25,000 · OtherGROW BY DESIGN — $25,000 · OtherNEIGHBORWORKS BOISE — $42,000 · OtherNEIGHBORWORKS BOISETOOLING AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $28,000 · Other+26 more — $327,000 · Other+26 moreBakerRipley — $65,000 · Human ServicesBakerRipleyNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC — $36,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD CEN…IDAHO DIAPER BANK INC — $27,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO DIAPER BAN…THE ARC OF VOLUSIA INC — $23,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF VOLUS…FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY — $16,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE O…Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc — $14,000 · Human ServicesChildren's Home …Community Child Care Council of Sonoma County — $14,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Child …FOSTER AND HEART — $13,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER AND HEARTPalmyra Community Center — $12,000 · Human ServicesCompassion United — $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Center for Youth Services Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK — $63,000 · EducationTHE LEGACY PRO…INSPIREDU INC — $45,000 · EducationINSPIREDU INCHeart Math Tutoring Inc — $41,000 · EducationHeart Math Tut…Communities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc — $18,000 · EducationCommunities In…LUPINE COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $15,000 · EducationLUPINE COMMUNI…GIRLS ON THE RUN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC — $15,000 · EducationGIRLS ON THE R…LeTourneau University — $13,000 · EducationLeTourneau Uni…Cure Sanfilippo Foundation — $52,000 · HealthCure Sanfil…Dilworth Center for Chemical Dependency — $35,000 · HealthDilworth Ce…Breast Cancer Coalition of Rochester Inc — $21,000 · HealthBreast Canc…INHERITANCE OF HOPE INC — $15,000 · HealthINHERITANCE…SURGERY ON SUNDAY INC — $15,000 · HealthSURGERY ON …PERINATAL NETWORK OF MONROE COUNTY INC — $13,000 · HealthPERINATAL N…+2 more — $10,000 · Health+2 moreFreedom School Partners Inc — $78,000 · Youth DevelopmentFreedom S…Fostering Kindness Corp — $54,000 · Youth DevelopmentFostering…E4E RELIEF LLC — $100,000 · Public Safety & DisasterKIDS AGAINST HUNGER BAY AREA — $11,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $44,000 · Civil RightsDRESS FOR SUCCESS SAN FRANCISCO — $30,000 · Civil Rights
Other$727,000Human Services$240,000Education$210,000Health$161,000Youth Development$132,000Public Safety & Disaster$111,000Civil Rights$74,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetE4E RELIEF LLC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFreedom School Partners Inc — $78,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBakerRipley — $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK — $63,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFostering Kindness Corp — $54,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetCure Sanfilippo Foundation — $52,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetINSPIREDU INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $44,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORWORKS BOISE — $42,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHeart Math Tutoring Inc — $41,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC — $36,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDilworth Center for Chemical Dependency — $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS SAN FRANCISCO — $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTOOLING AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $28,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetIDAHO DIAPER BANK INC — $27,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ARC OF VOLUSIA INC — $23,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY — $23,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBreast Cancer Coalition of Rochester Inc — $21,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCommunities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILLS CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION — $17,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY — $16,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLUPINE COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $15,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetINHERITANCE OF HOPE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSURGERY ON SUNDAY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetChildren's Home Society of North Carolina Inc — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Child Care Council of Sonoma County — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERINATAL NETWORK OF MONROE COUNTY INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLeTourneau University — $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY BROTHER'S TABLE INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOSTER AND HEART — $13,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPalmyra Community Center — $12,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetKIDS AGAINST HUNGER BAY AREA — $11,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHEARTISANS MARKETPLACE — $11,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEDWARD BOSS PRADO FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center for Youth Services Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEARTS FOR HEARTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 66% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Community FoundationNY15.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Chubb Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Enpro Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 73%
  • Family Promise of Northern New Castle County73% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Center of West Volusia Inc27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Enpro Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Enpro Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph