Skip to content

· Public charity

Enlace Chicago

Enlace Chicago convenes, organizes, and builds the capacity of little village stakeholders to confront systemic inequities and barriers to economic and social access.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$1.0MYouth Development$919kHuman Services$424kHealth$216kRecreation & Sports$160kArts & Culture$93kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $195k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $109k
$28,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Life Center of Chicago$109,250
Chicago Youth Boxing Club$30,000
Central States SER$29,000
Erie Neighborhood House$28,000
Telpochcalli Community$27,000
Universidad Popular$27,000
Beyond the Ball$27,000
Mt Sinai Hospital$27,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $810k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $62k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $34k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $32k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $28k → 14%Erie Neighborhood House: $28k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $22k → 14%Erie Neighborhood House: $18k → 14%Erie Neighborhood House: $15k → 14%Erie Neighborhood House: $14k → 14%The Network Advocating: $6k → 14%TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT: $65k → 14%TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT: $64k → 14%Telpochcalli Community: $39k → 14%TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT: $37k → 14%TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION: $37k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $34k → 14%TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT: $34k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $32k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $28k → 14%Telpochcalli Community: $27k → 14%Telpochcalli Community Education: $26k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $22k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $22k → 14%Telpochcalli Community: $21k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $17k → 14%YMCA Metropolitan Chicago: $13k → 14%Community Activism Lawyers Alliance: $36k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 11 repeat orgs$234k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$2.6M
$234k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+25%

Still filing today

91%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    New Life Centers of Chicagoland
    8× · 2017–2025 · $629k · revenue ×16
  • TC
    TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $349k · revenue +93%
  • LC
    Latin Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $333k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • LP
    Latinos Progresando
    one grant, 2022 · $93k · revenue -27%
  • BL
    BEYOND LEGAL AIDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +318%
  • SA
    Saint Anthony Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
2
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
3
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
4
Alianza Leadership Institute

The Alliance of the SouthEast (ASE) builds the capacity of leaders, organizers, and associations that carry out community and social change. We envision a powerful grassroots base that impacts decision makers and wins real improvements in…

Human Services
5
Enlace Chicago

Enlace Chicago convenes, organizes, and builds the capacity of little village stakeholders to confront systemic inequities and barriers to economic and social access. Enlace Chicago is dedicated to making a positive difference in the lives…

Community Improvement
6
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
7
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
8
Chicago Jobs Council

Chicago Jobs Council (CJC) pursues its mission through advocacy, applied research, public education and capacity-building initiatives focused on influencing the development or reform of public policies and programs. From 18 original…

—
9
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
10
International Latino Cultural Center of Chicago

Develop, promote and increase awareness of latino cultures among latino communities through film and video events, education and other art forms

—
11
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
12
Chicago Workers' Collaborative Nfp

Chicago Workers' Collaborative's mission is to promote full employment and equality for the lowest wage-earners, primarily temporary staffing workers, in the Chicago region through leadership and skills training, critical assistance and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Erie Neighborhood House; the most unlike its peers is Designs for Dignity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New Life Centers of Chicagoland: $628,687 · Youth DevelopmentNew Life Centers of ChicagolandBEYOND THE BALL NFP: $225,050 · Youth DevelopmentBEYOND THE BALL NFPTELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT: $349,225 · Human ServicesTELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION…ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $251,665 · Human ServicesERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSEThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $167,175 · Human ServicesThe YMCA of Metropolitan ChicagoBEYOND LEGAL AID: $36,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,500 · Human ServicesLatin Center: $332,925 · OtherLatin CenterCENTRAL STATES SER JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC: $182,925 · OtherCENTRAL STATES SER JOBS F…THE LEARNING CENTER HOUSE OF CONNECTIONS: $55,000 · OtherTHE LEARNING CENTER HOUSE…DE LASALLE INSTITUTE: $55,000 · OtherDE LASALLE INSTITUTE+2 more: $25,500 · OtherChicago Youth Boxing Club: $224,862 · Recreation & SportsMOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $159,175 · HealthSaint Anthony Hospital: $30,000 · HealthCONTINUUM HEALTH PARTNERS INC: $27,250 · HealthLatinos Progresando: $93,000 · Arts & CultureDESIGNS FOR DIGNITY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFOREFRONT: $7,000 · Philanthropy
Youth Development$853,737Human Services$809,565Other$651,350Recreation & Sports$224,862Health$216,425Arts & Culture$93,000Philanthropy$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Life Centers of Chicagoland: $628,687 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT: $349,225 over 9y, 23% of budgetLatin Center: $332,925 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $251,665 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBEYOND THE BALL NFP: $225,050 over 9y, 14% of budgetChicago Youth Boxing Club: $224,862 over 9y, 13% of budgetCENTRAL STATES SER JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC: $182,925 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $167,175 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $159,175 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLatinos Progresando: $93,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE LEARNING CENTER HOUSE OF CONNECTIONS: $55,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetBEYOND LEGAL AID: $36,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSaint Anthony Hospital: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREFRONT: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New Life Centers of Chicagoland ↗
  • Who funds TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Latin Center ↗
  • Who funds ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND THE BALL NFP ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Youth Boxing Club ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL STATES SER JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Latinos Progresando ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING CENTER HOUSE OF CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND LEGAL AID ↗
  • Who funds Saint Anthony Hospital ↗
  • Who funds DESIGNS FOR DIGNITY ↗
  • Who funds FOREFRONT ↗
  • Who funds THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL22.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Healthy Communities Foundation · Michael Reese Health Trust · Imc Chicago Charitable Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · Greater Chicago Food Depository · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enlace Chicago funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enlace Chicago. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Enlace Chicago’s filings →

    More from the funding graph