Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$315k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
20
Grants FY2025
18
Organizations funded FY2024
6%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$16,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$45,000
Organizations funded a year
18 to 22
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
9
Total assets, FY2025
$4.2M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 6% of the organizations Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving20$315k10%
FY202418$284k6%
FY202321$287k38%
FY202222$358k14%
FY202120$272kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Animals$1.5MOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
KS
TN
SC
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust USA Inc$220,00051%
No Dogs Left Behind Inc$170,00053%
Paws of War Inc$120,00051%
Big Oaks Rescue Farm$85,000321%
Almost Home Wellness Center$85,000310%
Helping Hands Humane Society Incorporated$84,0005n/a
Home For Good Dog Rescue Inc$77,50032%
The Sato Project$75,00022%
Sweet Onion Animal Protection Society$72,000511%
Palmetto Animal Welfare Services Inc$70,0005n/a
Show all 26 grantees
All grantees of Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust USA Inc$220,00051%
No Dogs Left Behind Inc$170,00053%
Paws of War Inc$120,00051%
Big Oaks Rescue Farm$85,000321%
Almost Home Wellness Center$85,000310%
Helping Hands Humane Society Incorporated$84,0005n/a
Home For Good Dog Rescue Inc$77,50032%
The Sato Project$75,00022%
Sweet Onion Animal Protection Society$72,000511%
Palmetto Animal Welfare Services Inc$70,0005n/a
Four Paws International Inc$50,00021%
Friends of Screven County Animals$36,000239%
Peaceful Fields Sanctuary Corporation$35,00059%
No Trouble at All Animal Outreach$30,0003n/a
Pets With Disabilities Inc$28,00023%
Big Dog Haven Inc$25,00053%
Muva Rufferz Rescue Inc$25,0001n/a
All Bassets Cherished Basset Hound Rescue Inc$25,00053%
Dogs Deserve Better Inc$20,00022%
Guardians of Rescue Inc$20,00021%
Jenkins County K-9-1-1 Rescue$12,0002n/a
Releash Atlanta Inc$10,00022%
Byram Animal Rescue Kindness Squad Inc$10,00023%
Cat Around Town Project$10,00033%
Canine Rescue$10,00015%
Hastys Haven Inc$6,00032%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($105k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 21 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust USA Inc: $220,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNo Dogs Left Behind Inc: $170,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetPaws of War Inc: $120,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBig Oaks Rescue Farm: $85,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetAlmost Home Wellness Center: $85,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetHome For Good Dog Rescue Inc: $77,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetThe Sato Project: $75,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSweet Onion Animal Protection Society: $72,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetFour Paws International Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFriends of Screven County Animals: $36,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetPeaceful Fields Sanctuary Corporation: $35,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetPets With Disabilities Inc: $28,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetBig Dog Haven Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetAll Bassets Cherished Basset Hound Rescue Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetDogs Deserve Better Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetGuardians of Rescue Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetReleash Atlanta Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetByram Animal Rescue Kindness Squad Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCat Around Town Project: $10,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetCanine Rescue: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHastys Haven Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC11.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · AbbVie Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust with peer funders

About Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust

How much does Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust give?
Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust reported 20 grants totaling $315,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 18 and 22 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (98%).
Who are Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: The David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust USA Inc ($220k), No Dogs Left Behind Inc ($170k), Paws of War Inc ($120k).
Does Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 6% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Paypal Charitable Giving Fund, Network for Good, AbbVie Foundation.
Where is Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust based?
Empty Cages Forever Charitable Trust is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Empty Cages Forever’s filings →

More from the funding graph