Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Emma Clyde Hodge Memorial Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$529k
Granted FY2025still arriving
57
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Arts & Culture$1.4MEducation$913kHealth$841kHuman Services$368kEnvironment$213kPublic Safety & Disaster$194kCivil Rights$191kHousing & Shelter$123kOther$0
02FY2025 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $110k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $309k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$6,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER$57,000
PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$53,000
PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST$35,000
KING OF KINGS LUTHERAN CHURCH$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$24,000
MERCY SHIPS$20,000
THIEL COLLEGE$20,000
VMI$15,000
BASCOMB PALMER EYE INSTITUTE$10,000
BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL$10,000
ST LUKES HOSPITAL$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$10,000
SAVE THE BAY$10,000
FESTIVAL BALLET PROVIDENCE$10,000
WESTERLY LAND TRUST$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $496k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $26k → 13%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $15k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC: $8k → 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $20k → 13%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC: $8k → 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $17k → 13%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC: $8k → 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC: $8k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $8k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AVOW HOSPICE: $20k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $6k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $10k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $6k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $10k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $10k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $10k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $6k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $6k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $6k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $5k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $10k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $10k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $10k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
RI
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 88 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

88 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

88
12

Total granted

$4.7M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+54%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $407k · revenue +226%
  • PS
    PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $403k · revenue +84%
  • PP
    PITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $270k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • HS
    HAWTHORN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MP
    Missouri Prairie Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +87%
  • SD
    SUSAN D FLYNN ONCOLOGY NURSING
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Missouri Prairie Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesAnimal Rescue and ShelterMilitary Veterans SupportDance Arts OrganizationsEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%37%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/65
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,500

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/59
Grantees still filing
52/59
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FEDERATION FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM — $181,002 · OtherFEDERATION FOR IMMIGRATION REFORMVMI — $170,000 · OtherVMIBASCOMB PALMER EYE INSTITUTE — $150,000 · OtherBASCOMB PALMER EYE INSTITUTEUPCI & UPMC CANCER CENTERS — $120,000 · OtherUPCI & UPMC CANCER CENTERSMOSES BROWN SCHOOL — $94,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $80,000 · OtherTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS — $76,006 · Other+56 more — $1,171,738 · Other+56 morePITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC — $407,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INCPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC — $403,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INCPITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION — $270,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPOR…PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST — $126,031 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUSTBALLET RI — $59,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $112,500 · Arts & Culture+3 moreTHIEL COLLEGE — $180,000 · EducationTHIEL COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $153,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $43,000 · EducationTHE TAFT SCHO…VALLEY SCHOOL OF LIGONIER — $41,000 · EducationVALLEY SCHOOL…Literacy Volunteers of Washington County — $40,000 · EducationLiteracy Volu…KENT SCHOOL — $30,000 · EducationDavidson College — $26,500 · Education+5 more — $74,000 · Education+5 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $72,925 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT…AVOW Hospice Inc — $60,000 · Human ServicesAVOW Hospice…THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE — $51,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S …LIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION — $40,200 · Human ServicesLIGONIER VAL…YOUTH HAVEN INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN …GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES…EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $35,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RE…LIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC — $32,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE O…Guadalupe Center Inc — $28,120 · Human ServicesMOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Human Services+4 more — $22,500 · Human ServicesSAVE THE BAY INC — $107,000 · EnvironmentLOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC — $12,000 · EnvironmentMissouri Prairie Foundation — $5,000 · Environment+1 more — $500 · EnvironmentST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterMercy Ships International — $50,000 · International
Other$2,042,746Arts & Culture$1,377,531Education$587,500Human Services$546,745Environment$124,500Housing & Shelter$50,000International$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC — $407,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC — $403,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION — $270,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHIEL COLLEGE — $180,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $153,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST — $126,031 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE BAY INC — $107,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS — $76,006 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $72,925 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAVOW Hospice Inc — $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET RI — $59,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WESTERLY LAND TRUST — $55,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE — $51,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES MUSEUM OF ART — $45,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $43,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc — $41,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY SCHOOL OF LIGONIER — $41,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION — $40,200 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLiteracy Volunteers of Washington County — $40,000 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATRE INC — $32,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC — $32,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENT SCHOOL — $30,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Second Chance Inc — $29,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $28,120 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDavidson College — $26,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC — $26,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWESTERLY COLLEGE CLUB INC — $19,500 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $19,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $18,040 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $17,436 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUS ENGLISH FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $15,954 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY — $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WESTERLY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC — $12,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budget1889 FOUNDATION INC — $11,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetST EDMUND'S ACADEMY — $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FLYNN FOUNDATION INC — $10,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THIEL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds AVOW Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds BALLET RI ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTERLY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Economic Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY SCHOOL OF LIGONIER ↗
  • Who funds LIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Volunteers of Washington County ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard King Mellon F…The Pittsburgh Founda…Giant Eagle FoundationThe Fine FoundationEden Hall FoundationThe Grable FoundationThe Heinz EndowmentsHillman Family Founda…The Rhode Island Comm…Sheryl K & Bruce M Wo…Katherine Mabis McKen…The Simpson Family Fo…
Richard King Mellon FoundationPA21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · The Fine Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Hillman Family Foundations · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Sheryl K & Bruce M Wolf Family Foundation · Katherine Mabis McKenna Foundation · The Simpson Family Foundation U/A Dtd 10/19/1999

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Emma Clyde Hodge Memorial Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
  • Ymca of Collier County — 0% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines