Skip to content

· Public charity

Emerald Development & Economic Network

Eden's mission is to provide housing solutions to people facing the challenges of housing insecurities and homelessness.

$36M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$12MHuman Services$1.3MReligion$404kHealth$380kScience & Tech$195k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $2,181,594, the rows itemized in this filing. The $36,059,569 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $33,877,975 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $242k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.9M
$242,195
Median grant
1
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC$1,543,489
THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN$320,030
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$242,195
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND$31,874
UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT$30,764
YWCA OF CLEVELAND$13,242
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $11.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.5M → 17%MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.5M → 17%MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.5M → 17%MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.5M → 17%MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.4M → 17%MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.3M → 17%MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.2M → 17%MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.0M → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $66k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $62k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $59k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $56k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $31k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 8 repeat orgs$568k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$14M
$248k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +10%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $765k · revenue +42%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO
    4× · 2021–2024 · $404k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • EA
    EMERALD ALLIANCE VIII LP
    one grant, 2018 · $32k
  • EA
    EMERALD ALLIANCE LP
    one grant, 2018 · $31k
  • EA
    EMERALD ALLIANCE IX LP
    one grant, 2018 · $29k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clermont Counseling Center

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
2
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
3
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services
4
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
5
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
6
Family Recovery Center

To provide treatment and prevention of substance abuse and related mental health problems for the residents of columbiana county and surrounding counties.

Health
7
Community Support Services Inc

Serves as a safety net for those summit county residents who are most in need of behavioral health services as a result of severe and persistent mental illness the agency proveides comprehensive, high quality, cost-effective treatment,…

Health
8
The Center for Women and Families Inc

To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.

Human Services
9
Compass Family & Community Services

Compass helps individuals and families build better lives and a stronger community.

Human Services
10
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
11
Jewish Family Services

To help individuals and families achieve economic self-sufficiency and emotional stability.

Human Services
12
New Horizons Mental Health Services Inc

To provide mental health care to children, adults, and families of the fairfield county area and occasionally to other counties in the state of ohio

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is University Settlement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC: $11,109,795 · Human ServicesMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC+2 more: $593,926 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $764,723 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS …FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $726,298 · OtherFAMILY PROMIS…+9 more: $248,311 · Other+9 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $404,387 · ReligionRECOVERY RESOURCES: $304,391 · HealthCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $75,374 · HealthJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING: $229,885 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$11,703,721Other$1,739,332Religion$404,387Health$379,765Crime & Legal$229,885

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC: $11,109,795 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $764,723 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $726,298 over 8y, 15% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $404,387 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetThe Centers for Families and Children: $320,030 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRECOVERY RESOURCES: $304,391 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC: $273,896 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING: $229,885 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $75,374 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO ↗
  • Who funds The Centers for Families and Children ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Woodruff FoundationOH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Woodruff Foundation · United Way of Greater Cleveland · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · Community West Foundation · William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · Thatcher Family Fund · The Lozick Family Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · E S Prentiss Foundation-Ir

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Emerald Development & Economic Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emerald Development & Economic Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Emerald Development & Economic Network?

    Find your warmest path to Emerald Development & Economic Network through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Emerald Development & Economic Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph