Skip to content
Emc Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Emc Health Foundation

EMC HEALTH FOUNDATION is committed to promoting and expanding care for members of the community as whole persons, considering their physical, psychosocial, and spiritual health in an atmosphere of professional excellence and human kindness.

$321k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.6MEducation$496kFood & Nutrition$385kArts & Culture$100kHousing & Shelter$70kPhilanthropy$55kHuman Services$10kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $248,011, the rows itemized in this filing. The $320,510 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $72,499 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$24,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION$100,000
UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION$50,000
UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION$25,000
MONTE VISTA CHAPEL$24,000
UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION$20,000
TOWER PHARMACY$15,011
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC SCHOOL-TURLOCK$14,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION: $50k → 15%TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION: $20k → 15%SOCIETY FOR disABILITIES: $55k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 11 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
27

Total granted

$1.4M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+72%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $140k · revenue +60%
  • TC
    TURLOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $116k · revenue +5%
  • TG
    TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $70k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • US
    UOP SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
    one grant, 2021 · $360k
  • LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +160%
  • SV
    SIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY
    one grant, 2019 · $105k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
2
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
3
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
4
Santa Rosa Community Health Centers

The Santa Rosa Community Health Centers are dedicated to providing excellent, comprehensive primary health care, prevention, and health education for people who are uninsured and underinsured in Santa Rosa, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
5
Community Health Centers of the Central Coast Inc

To provide primary health and dental care services to low income patients in the Central Coast Communities of California

Health
6
Christ Clinic

Providing reliable, accessible, high quality medical services to the most vunerable people in our community.

Health
7
Clinica De Salud Del Valle De Salinas

Clinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas (CSVS) is dedicated to providing access to quality comprehensive health care to men, women and children with an emphasis on farm worker families and the agricultural community.

Health
8
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Inc

Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.

Health
9
Vista Community Clinic

The mission of Vista Community Clinic is to advance community health and hope by providing access to premier health services and education for those who need it most.

Health
10
Sonora Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Sonora

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
11
Adventist Health Tulare

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

—
12
Central Valley Health Network Inc

Central Valley Health Network is a not-for-profit regional association representing 16 Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that serve low-income and medically underserved communities throughout California's greater Central Valley,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Livingston Community Health; the most unlike its peers is The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UOP SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY: $360,000 · OtherUOP SCHOOL OF DENTISTRYStanislaus Health Foundation: $350,000 · OtherStanislaus Health FoundationTURLOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $116,000 · OtherTURLOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INCSIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY: $105,000 · OtherSIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILYCARNEGIE ARTS CENTER: $100,000 · OtherCARNEGIE ARTS CENTERSACRED HEART CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $52,000 · Other+20 more: $468,026 · Other+20 moreLIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH: $200,000 · HealthLIVINGSTON COMMUNITY …CASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $140,000 · HealthCASTLE FAMILY HEALTH …Community Health Centers of America: $100,000 · HealthCommunity Health Cent…GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS: $45,000 · HealthGOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH …VIA HEART PROJECT: $25,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthUNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION: $470,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED SAMARITANS FO…CARNEGIE ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION TURLOCK: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCARNEGIE ARTS CENTER…TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION: $70,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $55,000 · Human ServicesTURLOCK CHAPLAINCY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSONSHINE BIBLE CLUBS: $15,000 · ReligionPRODIGAL SONS & DAUGHTERS INC: $10,000 · ReligionTURLOCK CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,551,026Health$515,000Philanthropy$500,000Human Services$135,000Religion$25,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION: $470,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetStanislaus Health Foundation: $350,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetLIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH: $200,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $140,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTURLOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $116,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCommunity Health Centers of America: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION: $70,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $55,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetGOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION TURLOCK: $30,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetVIA HEART PROJECT: $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetThe Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia Counseling Services: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSONSHINE BIBLE CLUBS: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTURLOCK CHAPLAINCY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetPRODIGAL SONS & DAUGHTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetTURLOCK CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Stanislaus Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds TURLOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Health Centers of America ↗
  • Who funds TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION TURLOCK ↗
  • Who funds VIA HEART PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds The Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia Counseling Services ↗
  • Who funds SONSHINE BIBLE CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds TURLOCK CHAPLAINCY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRODIGAL SONS & DAUGHTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds TURLOCK CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Legacy Health Endowme…Stanislaus Community …Sunlight GivingCovenant Ministries o…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Legacy Health EndowmentCA34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Legacy Health Endowment · Stanislaus Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Covenant Ministries of Benevolence · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Emc Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emc Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Emc Health Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Emc Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Emc Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home