Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elohim Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$258kReligion$163kPhilanthropy$50kHealth$30kCrime & Legal$21kInternational$21kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$45,000
CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP$11,000
REDEEMER CITY TO CITY$10,000
UNITED WAY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - DARDEN FOUNDATION$10,000
CHILDREN'S HARBOR$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP$5,000
BIGTIME MINISTRIES$2,500
CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$2,500
RENEW BIRMINGHAM$2,500
TRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES$2,500
SHEPHERDS FOLD INC$2,500
THE FOUNDRY$1,000
GORDON COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIG OAK RANCH: $5k → 13%RENEW BIRMINGHAM: $3k → 16%RENEW BIRMINGHAM: $3k → 16%CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP: $11k → 16%CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP: $11k → 16%CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP: $11k → 16%CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP: $11k → 16%CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP: $11k → 16%HEART GALLERY ALABAMA: $500 → 16%HEART GALLERY ALABAMA: $500 → 16%HEART GALLERY OF ALABAMA: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
IN
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$565k · 31 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
8

Total granted

$565k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

55%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +48%
  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • RC
    Redeemer City To City
    5× · 2020–2024 · $38k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • BO
    BIG OAK RANCH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +57%
  • HB
    HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2020 · $700 · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
2
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
3
Prison Fellowship International

To transform the lives of prisoners, their families, and victims through a global network of ministry partners.

Crime & Legal
4
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
5
Transform Ministries
—
6
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
7
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
8
Brother Bryan Mission

Brother bryan mission is a christ centered ministry serving economically, emotionally, and spiritually impoverished individuals in the birmingham, alabama area. the mission's goal is for each of its clients to return to their environment…

Human Services
9
Mission Mutual

Equipping mission, ministry, and philanthropic organizations (of similar vision) with the organizational and relational perspective needed to accelerate and enhance their collective impact. mission mutual exists to provide centralized…

International
10
Wisdom Hunters Resources Inc

Wisdom hunters resources, inc., an atlanta-based ministry created to encourage christians (a.k.a wisdom hunters) to apply god's unchanging truth in a changing world. the organization impacts wisdom hunters in over 86 countries across the…

Recreation & Sports
11
Back to the Bible

We provide personalized resources that help you move closer to jesus, experience a transformed life, and become a biblically engaged disciple-maker.see schedule o

Religion
12
Unify Ministries
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Harbor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Animal Welfare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $195,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - DARDEN FOUNDATION: $41,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - DARDEN FOUNDATIONCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $12,500 · Other+22 more: $56,300 · Other+22 moreRedeemer City To City: $37,500 · ReligionRedeemer City To …BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $26,250 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLO…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEBIGTIME MINISTRIES: $10,500 · ReligionBIGTIME MINISTRIE…+1 more: $300 · ReligionTHE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER F…RENEW BIRMINGHAM: $5,000 · Human ServicesRENEW BIRMIN…BIG OAK RANCH INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANC…+1 more: $1,250 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…CHILDREN'S HARBOR INC: $25,000 · HealthTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES: $12,500 · HealthIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $700 · HealthSHEPHERDS FOLD INC: $21,250 · Crime & LegalGORDON COLLEGE: $4,500 · Education
Other$305,050Religion$89,550Human Services$66,250Philanthropy$50,000Health$41,200Crime & Legal$21,250Education$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRedeemer City To City: $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $26,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HARBOR INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERDS FOLD INC: $21,250 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES: $12,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBIGTIME MINISTRIES: $10,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetRENEW BIRMINGHAM: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON COLLEGE: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION ENABLERS INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNoah's Ark Animal Rehabilitation Center and Sanctuary Inc: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEART GALLERY OF ALABAMA INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL WELFARE FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 17% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhitelock Ministries Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Monday Morning Quarterback Club: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Redeemer City To City ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS FOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BIGTIME MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds RENEW BIRMINGHAM ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GORDON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ENABLERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Noah's Ark Animal Rehabilitation Center and Sanctuary Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEART GALLERY OF ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL WELFARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Whitelock Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Monday Morning Quarterback Club ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Burton Family FoundationAL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Burton Family Foundation · Debardeleben Foundation Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · The Robert and Lois Luckie Charitable Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Protective Life Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elohim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elohim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Gordon College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elohim’s filings →

More from the funding graph