Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ellen Abbott Gilman Trust U/W 0732200

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$53kHealth$51kAnimals$29kYouth Development$29kHuman Services$23kArts & Culture$10kCrime & Legal$10kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$502k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON$5,000
WELLFLEET FOOD PANTRY$5,000
MILTON ACADEMY$5,000
CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND$5,000
MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY$5,000
MA AUDOBON SOCIETY$4,000
FLEET FUND INC$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DANVERS COMMUNITY YMCA: $3k → 10%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON: $5k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON: $5k → 16%THE FLEETFUND: $5k → 8%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $5k → 16%FLEET FUND INC: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$211k · 14 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$211k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+26%

Still filing today

71%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILTON ACADEMY
    3× · 2024–2026 · $25k · revenue +10%
  • TC
    THE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $25k · revenue +43%
  • NB
    North Bennet Street School
    4× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • LB
    LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY - BOSTON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +30%
  • READ TO A CHILD INC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • MA
    Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc

Our mission is to always welcome and connect young people and families to opportunities that embrace diversity, nurture growth, and inspire success.

Youth Development
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Brookline Teen Center

Btc's vision is for all brookline students to engage in their community and emerge ready for college, career, and beyond. our mission is to provide a platform where all teens can explore, create, and discover who they are. through…

Youth Development
4
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Associates Inc

MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR ASSOCIATES, INC. ("MEEA") IS A SPECIALTY PHYSICIAN GROUP PRACTICE. IT PROVIDES CARE FOR PATIENTS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY, INC. ("MEEI"), A RELATED ORGANIZATION. THE PRACTICE SPECIALIZES IN…

Health
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
The Sportsmen's Tennis & Enrichment Center Inc

To build leaders on the court, in the classroom, and in the community by providing academic, wellness, and social development programs alongside recreational and competitive tennis instruction for youth and adults. sportsmen's tennis and…

—
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
8
Trustees of Phillips Academy

Phillips academy is a coeducational, boarding school located in andover, massachusetts for students in grades nine through twelve and post-graduates. the school strives to help young people from diverse backgrounds achieve their potential…

Education
9
Boston Arts Summer Institute Inc
Recreation & Sports
10
Jewish Community Centers of Greater Boston

To advance the aspirations of families and individuals to enrich their lives, bodies and spirits, by providing the best in contemporary programs and experiences, informed by jewish values for today's jews and the people in their lives.

Human Services
11
Buckingham Browne & Nichols School

Bb&n, an all gender day school in cambridge, massachusetts, was established in 1974 by the merger of two independent schools, the buckingham school and the browne & nichols school, founded respectively in 1889 and 1883. located on multiple…

Education
12
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arts for Learning Massachusetts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILTON ACADEMY: $25,000 · EducationMILTON ACADEMYNorth Bennet Street School: $18,000 · EducationNorth Bennet Street SchoolFenway High School Fund CO Fenway High School: $10,000 · EducationFenway High School Fund CO Fe…READ TO A CHILD INC: $5,000 · EducationREAD TO A CHILD INCWELLFLEET FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 · EducationWELLFLEET FOOD PANTRYMA AUDOBON SOCIETY: $33,000 · OtherMA AUDOBON SOCIETYRAW ART WORKS INC: $6,000 · OtherRAW ART WORKS INCIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVISUALLY IMPAIRED ADVANCEMENT: $6,000 · OtherVISUALLY IMPAIRED ADVANCEM…Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc: $5,000 · OtherMassachusetts Adoption Res…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherTHE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 · HealthTHE CARROLL CENTER FOR TH…MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $20,000 · HealthMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR I…OUTER CAPE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $10,000 · HealthOUTER CAPE HEALTH SERVICE…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S …FLEET FUND INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesFLEET FUND I…LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY - BOSTON INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE BROTH…THE COMMUNITY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DANVERS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNIT…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…JAMES D STCLAIR COURT PUBLIC EDUCATION PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalARTS FOR LEARNING MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$63,000Other$57,000Health$55,000Human Services$27,000Youth Development$23,000Crime & Legal$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILTON ACADEMY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Bennet Street School: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFenway High School Fund CO Fenway High School: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOUTER CAPE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES D STCLAIR COURT PUBLIC EDUCATION PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFLEET FUND INC: $9,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetRAW ART WORKS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY - BOSTON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREAD TO A CHILD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMassachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARTS FOR LEARNING MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DANVERS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Liberty Mutual Foundation IncMA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Clinton H & Wilma T Shattuck Char Tr #0758945 · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ellen Abbott Gilman Trust U/W 0732200 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ellen Abbott Gilman Trust U/W 0732200. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Outer Cape Health Services Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Raw Art Works Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Arts for Learning Massachusetts Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Milton Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ellen Abbott Gilman Trust U/W 0732200’s filings →

More from the funding graph