Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Elizabeth F Cheney Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2022
84
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Arts & Culture$6.0MPublic Benefit$160kEducation$125kRecreation & Sports$124kAnimals$66kHealth$57kPhilanthropy$30kReligion$24kOther$0
02FY2022 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k51 grants · $187k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $598k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$211k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO$100,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$100,000
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$100,000
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$40,000
NU SCHOOL OF MUSIC$40,000
LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO$40,000
GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL$40,000
WFMT$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
JOFFREY BALLET$25,000
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$20,000
STEPPENWOLF THEATRE$20,000
GOODMAN THEATRE$20,000
EVANSTON HISTORY MUSEUM$20,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER & MONROE CITY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BARNABAS: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
IA
CA
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Elizabeth F Cheney Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 82% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Elizabeth F Cheney Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 104 repeat orgs$538k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

104 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2022, 62 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

104
64

Total granted

$6.2M
$404k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+19%

Still filing today

46%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    6× · 2017–2022 · $731k · revenue +58%
  • LO
    Lyric Opera of Chicago
    6× · 2017–2022 · $699k · revenue +33%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    6× · 2017–2022 · $590k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • GT
    GOODMAN THEATER
    one grant, 2020 · $46k
  • FM
    FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +22%
  • S
    STEPPENWOLF
    one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chamber Opera of Chicago
2
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
3
Constellation Performing Arts

Constellation is a performing arts presenter with an emphasis on forward- thinking practices, particularly in the areas of jazz, improvised, experimental, and contemporary classical music.

Arts & Culture
4
Chicago Harp Quartet
5
Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra

Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra's mission as a professional orchestra is to utilize the universal expression of music to create profound, inspiring, and personal connections between the people and communities of Chicagos Southland.

Arts & Culture
6
Collaborative Arts Institute of Chicago
Arts & Culture
7
Foundation for Modern Opera
8
The Ballet Chicago Company

Ballet Chicago is a professional track school of ballet that creates exceptional dancers. It makes classical ballet training accessible to all. Its founders Daniel Duell and Patricia Blair carry on George Balanchines legacy by providing…

9
Cerqua Rivera Dance Theatre

To use multiple artistic forms (primarily dance and music) and the combined talents of our diverse company to convey intense personal narratives. We are proudly and visibly multicultural, exploring the intersection of heritage, culture,…

Arts & Culture
10
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
11
Chicago City Theatre Company dba Joel Hall Dancers & Center

To enrich the lives of our community through dance education and performance while developing Chicago's native talent pool in a welcoming environment that celebrates multiculturalism & ethnic diversity.

Arts & Culture
12
Rivendell Theatre Ensemble

Rivendell Theatre Ensemble is a professional Equity company dedicated to elevating the lives of women through the power of theatre.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Theatre Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Iowa Wesleyan University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr15%39%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr16%55%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/80
the rest of the field
16%
4,999/31,430

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 184 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/77
Grantees still filing
53/77
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Chicago Symphony Orchestra — $731,450 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony OrchestraLyric Opera of Chicago — $698,500 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of ChicagoGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $246,000 · Arts & CultureGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATIONCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC — $211,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INCTHE JOFFREY BALLET — $150,000 · Arts & CultureSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY — $145,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO OPERA THEATER — $143,900 · Arts & CultureCourt Theatre Fund — $135,000 · Arts & Culture+42 more — $1,085,350 · Arts & Culture+42 moreWFMT — $305,000 · OtherWFMTNorthwestern University- School of Music — $200,000 · OtherNorthwestern University- School of MusicWindows To The World — $180,000 · OtherWindows To The WorldCSO — $148,500 · OtherCSONU SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $100,000 · Other+116 more — $1,480,163 · Other+116 moreTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $590,000 · EducationTHE ART INS…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $65,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …+2 more — $12,000 · EducationNorthwestern University — $108,500 · Recreation & SportsThe Chicago Community Trust — $9,000 · PhilanthropyEvanston Community Foundation — $6,000 · PhilanthropyOAK PARK-RIVER FOREST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC — $3,000 · PhilanthropyFOREFRONT — $2,661 · PhilanthropyISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC — $9,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY — $1,500 · EnvironmentEndeavor Health Clinical Operations — $10,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$3,546,200Other$2,413,663Education$667,000Recreation & Sports$108,500Philanthropy$23,661Environment$10,500Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $731,450 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago — $698,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $590,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $246,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC — $211,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET — $150,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY — $145,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO OPERA THEATER — $143,900 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $108,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $102,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWriters Theatre Inc — $86,350 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMUSIC OF THE BAROQUE — $85,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD COAST PERCUSSION NFP — $60,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetEVANSTON HISTORY CENTER — $53,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCIVITAS ENSEMBLE — $52,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetCHICAGO CHORALE — $45,500 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC — $45,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVictory Gardens Theater — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMELIA ISLAND CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL — $29,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetMusic Theatre Works Inc — $25,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENESEE COUNTRY MUSEUM — $24,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetIowa Wesleyan University — $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBELLA VOCE — $22,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $21,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetSPEKTRAL QUARTET NFP — $20,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetACCESSIBLE CONTEMPORARY MUSIC — $20,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetREMBRANDT CHAMBER PLAYERS INC — $19,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetLifeline Productions Inc — $18,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO SINFONIETTA INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCEDILLE CHICAGO NFP — $15,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLUCKY PLUSH PRODUCTIONS — $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetAuditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Dancemakers Forum — $15,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCHICAGO A CAPPELLA — $15,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGUS GIORDANO'S JAZZ DANCE CHICAGO INC D/B/A GIORDANO DANCE CHICAGO — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHODOS DANCE CHICAGO — $15,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Music Chicago — $10,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFIFTH HOUSE ENSEMBLE — $10,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe People's Music School — $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC
  • Who funds THE JOFFREY BALLET
  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY
  • Who funds CHICAGO OPERA THEATER
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds MUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC
  • Who funds Writers Theatre Inc
  • Who funds MUSIC OF THE BAROQUE
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds THIRD COAST PERCUSSION NFP
  • Who funds EVANSTON HISTORY CENTER
  • Who funds CIVITAS ENSEMBLE
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHORALE
  • Who funds NORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC
  • Who funds Victory Gardens Theater

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley FoundationIL49× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Prince Foundation · The Irving Harris Foundation · Walder Foundation · John R Halligan Charitable Fund · Alphawood Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Elizabeth F Cheney Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elizabeth F Cheney Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Elizabeth F Cheney Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 184 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph