Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$303k
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MArts & Culture$459kHealth$177kAnimals$122kEnvironment$112kReligion$111kHuman Services$100kRecreation & Sports$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k42 grants · $153k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
$4,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOOVER INSTITUTION$25,000
STAR GOSPEL MISSION$25,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY HUMANITIES CENTER$20,000
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$20,000
CHANNEL 72 INC - THE MAGORA PROJECT$20,000
PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CA$10,000
MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL$7,500
DEFY VENTURES$7,500
INNER CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
TRUSTEE OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$5,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$5,000
JOHN AUSTIN CHENEY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION 5K: $5k → 11%ONE22: $5k → 5%EVERY CHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%LES AMIES: $2k → 14%ONE VOICE: $5k → 14%ONE VOICE: $5k → 14%ONE VOICE: $5k → 14%ONE VOICE: $5k → 14%ONE VOICE: $5k → 14%ONE VOICE: $3k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCATION: $32k → 14%ONE VOICE: $3k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCATION: $5k → 14%ONE VOICE: $3k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCATION: $5k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCATION: $5k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
IA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 68 repeat orgs$352k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
62

Total granted

$2.0M
$259k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+34%

Still filing today

62%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $277k · revenue +5%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $154k · revenue +3%
  • MS
    MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SG
    STAR GOSPEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • SU
    STANDFORD UNIVERSITY BING OVERSEAS STUDY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • AS
    AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wyoming Wildlife Advocates. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/88
Grantees still filing
69/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $327,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JU…The Trustees of Princeton University: $277,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $154,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDSMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $129,500 · EducationMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL+22 more: $267,000 · Education+22 moreThe Preservation Society of Charleston Inc: $92,500 · OtherThe Preservation Society of Charleston IncSTANFORD UNIVERSITY HUMANITIES CENTER: $87,500 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY HUMANITIES CENTEREPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER LA: $60,000 · OtherEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $55,000 · Other+93 more: $776,000 · Other+93 moreNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureWYOFILE: $40,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $37,500 · Arts & CultureGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES: $7,500 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $16,500 · Arts & CultureEARTHJUSTICE: $95,000 · EnvironmentThe Charleston Parks Conservancy: $10,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECTS INC: $4,000 · Environment+2 more: $1,500 · EnvironmentWYOMING WILDLIFE ADVOCATES: $56,250 · AnimalsLAKE OCONEE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $16,500 · AnimalsTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $15,500 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $5,000 · AnimalsCOUGAR FUND INC: $5,000 · AnimalsLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $5,000 · AnimalsNEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $48,000 · Human ServicesOne Voice: $34,000 · Human ServicesThe Everychild Foundation: $6,000 · Human ServicesOne22 Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,155,000Other$1,071,000Arts & Culture$172,000Environment$110,500Animals$103,250Human Services$100,000Philanthropy$46,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $327,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $277,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $154,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $129,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $95,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Preservation Society of Charleston Inc: $92,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWYOMING WILDLIFE ADVOCATES: $56,250 over 7y, 16% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $48,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWYOFILE: $40,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $37,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $36,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOne Voice: $34,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLAS MADRINAS: $33,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDEFY VENTURES INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE OCONEE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $16,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $15,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetThe Charleston Parks Conservancy: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDavidson College: $8,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLearnserve International: $8,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetADVANCE ILLINOIS NFP: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInvisible Institute: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Everychild Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLEARNING WITH A DIFFERENCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Association of Jackson Hole: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne22 Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds The Preservation Society of Charleston Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING WILDLIFE ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WYOFILE ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds LAS MADRINAS ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEFY VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LAKE OCONEE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nelson Family FoundationWY26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nelson Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Brooks Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Portland Trust II · Lenhardt Foundation · John M Rivers Jr Foundation · Robert S & Grayce B Kerr Foundation · Kirby Family Foundation Inc · Guffey Family Foundation · The Otis Booth Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 153 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart’s filings →

More from the funding graph