Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elbaz Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
67
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$3.0MScience & Tech$2.9MEducation$2.9MPhilanthropy$2.5MReligion$2.4MPublic Benefit$1.1MYouth Development$855kInternational$823kOther$0
02FY2024 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $695k
  • $50k–250k26 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$30,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONCRAWL FOUNDATION$500,000
Claremont McKenna College$370,000
Temple Beth AmPressman Academy$325,000
LA-Techorg$150,000
Earth Island Institute$150,000
California Community Foundation$150,000
Better Angels$100,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of Am$100,000
XPRIZE Foundation$100,000
American Israel Education Foundatio$80,000
California Institute of Technology$80,000
Crete Academy$75,000
Natural Resources Defense Council$75,000
Technovation$75,000
GOLDMAN SACHS PHILANTHROPY FUND$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $20k → 10%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $10k → 10%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $10k → 10%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $5k → 10%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $5k → 10%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $5k → 10%United in Harmony: $25k → 14%Belev Echad Inc: $25k → 17%United in Harmony: $25k → 14%United in Harmony: $25k → 14%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%Jenesse Center Inc: $50k → 14%Jenesse Center Inc: $10k → 14%Organization for Social Media Safet: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
DC
HI
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Elbaz Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 76%.

Elbaz Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 59 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 47 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
21

Total granted

$16M
$409k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+10%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $596k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Commoncrawl Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +634% · 100% of their budget
  • CM
    Claremont McKenna College
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +89%
  • Earth Island Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +271%

Funded once

  • CF
    CSOD Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • JA
    Jewish Agency Fund for Victims of T
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +490%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
4
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
7
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Iamangel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/78
Grantees still filing
57/78
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Temple Beth AmPressman Academy: $2,205,025 · OtherTemple Beth AmPressman AcademyClaremont McKenna College: $1,410,000 · OtherClaremont McKenna CollegeUPSTREAM: $410,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $575,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $412,000 · Other+56 more: $3,234,900 · Other+56 moreCommoncrawl Foundation: $2,385,000 · Science & TechCommoncrawl Founda…TECHNOVATION: $750,000 · Science & TechTECHNOVATION+2 more: $32,500 · Science & TechCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,800,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMU…LA-TECH ORG: $400,000 · PhilanthropyLA-TECH ORGGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $325,000 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADVISED…JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $150,000 · PhilanthropyBETTER ANGELS INC: $100,000 · Philanthropy+6 more: $167,500 · Philanthropy+6 moreEarth Island Institute Inc: $1,078,000 · EnvironmentEarth Island …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $605,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOU…OCEANA INC: $235,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $155,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIF…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $140,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL…+3 more: $155,000 · Environment+3 moreCRETE ACADEMY: $420,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $365,000 · EducationWINDWARD SCHOOL: $185,000 · EducationSOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES: $70,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACK: $60,000 · EducationPS Science: $50,000 · EducationTIYYA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Education+6 more: $110,000 · EducationX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $825,000 · Public BenefitPUBLICRESOURCEORG INC: $75,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $30,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $630,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUST: $120,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 · International+3 more: $63,000 · International
Other$8,246,925Science & Tech$3,167,500Philanthropy$2,942,500Environment$2,368,000Education$1,310,000Public Benefit$930,000International$863,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommoncrawl Foundation: $2,385,000 over 8y, 100% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,800,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetClaremont McKenna College: $1,410,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $1,078,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $825,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTECHNOVATION: $750,000 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $630,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $605,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $575,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCRETE ACADEMY: $420,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $412,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLA-TECH ORG: $400,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $365,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $325,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe 5 Gyres Institute: $255,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetOCEANA INC: $235,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWINDWARD SCHOOL: $185,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $165,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $165,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $155,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $145,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $140,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $140,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $92,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetA Foundation Building Strength Inc: $80,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetPUBLICRESOURCEORG INC: $75,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetUNITED IN HARMONY: $75,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $73,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES: $70,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJenesse Center Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $55,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetInternet Archive: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPS Science: $50,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIYYA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia YIMBY: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInner City Law Center: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDIGNITYMOVES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Commoncrawl Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Claremont McKenna College ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds X PRIZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CRETE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LA-TECH ORG ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds The 5 Gyres Institute ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDWARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BETTER ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds A Foundation Building Strength Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUBLICRESOURCEORG INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Goldhirsh Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation · Greater Horizons · Weingart Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elbaz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elbaz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elbaz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Elbaz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elbaz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph