Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.4MHealth$1.7MArts & Culture$705kEducation$301kReligion$106kEnvironment$29kInternational$20kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $385k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$400,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$250,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES$160,000
WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$95,000
HEYDAY BOOKS$80,000
YALE COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND$50,000
PASADENA PLAYHOUSE$25,000
THE ACTORS STUDIO INC$25,000
THE MIRMAN SCHOOL$20,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$20,000
THE MUSIC CENTER$20,000
THE FOOD BANK OF NEW YORK$20,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$10,000
THE FAMILY SCHOOL$10,000
BENEDICT CANYON ASSOCIATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 22 repeat orgs$531k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$3.6M
$491k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+37%

Still filing today

59%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    6× · 2019–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +41%
  • WA
    WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $595k · revenue +47%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $260k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +37%
  • UO
    University of Chicago Medical Center
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
8
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is 300SL Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,255,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $250,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGEL…THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $108,775 · OtherYALE COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND: $100,000 · Other+16 more: $262,746 · Other+16 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,700,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT …University of Chicago: $120,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $75,000 · Education+3 more: $51,000 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $1,005,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY …+1 more: $5,500 · PhilanthropyWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $595,000 · Arts & CultureWALLIS ANNENBER…Heyday: $220,000 · Arts & CultureHeydayTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PASADENA PL…+2 more: $12,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $260,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · InternationalMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $50,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTREEPEOPLE INC: $9,000 · Environment
Other$2,176,521Education$1,946,000Philanthropy$1,010,500Arts & Culture$877,500International$300,000Human Services$100,000Health$60,000Environment$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,700,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,255,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $1,005,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $595,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $260,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHeyday: $220,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWRITERS BLOC PRESENTS: $10,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget300SL Foundation: $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Heyday ↗
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WRITERS BLOC PRESENTS ↗
  • Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds 300SL Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph