Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$838k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$2.4MHealth$1.7MArts & Culture$705kEducation$301kReligion$106kEnvironment$29kInternational$20kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $400k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICAHN SCHOOLD OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$400,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES$200,000
WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$100,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
HEYDAY BOOKS$50,000
PASADENA PLAYHOUSE$25,000
THE FOOD BANK OF NY$5,000
UNITED OSTOMY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$4,471
BENEDICT CANYON ASSOCIATION$2,000
THE MUSIC CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 18 repeat orgs$538k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$2.6M
$461k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+37%

Still filing today

61%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +41%
  • WA
    WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $500k · revenue +47%
  • TJ
    THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $200k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +37%
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
10
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
11
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is 300SL Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%13%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%30%20–35yr12%22%35–55yr13%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%27%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr18%19%20–35yr12%4%35–55yr13%47%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
15%
14,986/101,484

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,255,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $250,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELESTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE — $106,290 · Other+13 more — $211,746 · Other+13 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $1,300,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUN…University of Chicago — $120,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $75,000 · Education+3 more — $31,000 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $845,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY F…+1 more — $5,500 · PhilanthropyWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $500,000 · Arts & CultureWALLIS ANNENBE…Heyday — $140,000 · Arts & CultureHeydayTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $7,500 · Arts & CultureMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesUniversity of Chicago Medical Center — $50,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $10,000 · InternationalTREEPEOPLE INC — $4,000 · Environment
Other$2,023,036Education$1,526,000Philanthropy$850,500Arts & Culture$672,500Human Services$100,000Health$60,000International$30,000Environment$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $1,300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,255,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $845,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $500,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetHeyday — $140,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago Medical Center — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget300SL Foundation — $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWRITERS BLOC PRESENTS — $5,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Elaine and Bram Goldsmith Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph