Skip to content
Egcmn Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Egcmn Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$299k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$489kReligion$180kPhilanthropy$170kAnimals$150kArts & Culture$129kScience & Tech$85kFood & Nutrition$58kRecreation & Sports$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$252k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK$150,000
FOCUS$75,000
GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH$20,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE$10,000
ADVOCATES FOR HEALTH$10,000
13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE$5,000
POP WARNER LITTLE SCHOLARS INC$5,000
HOLY TRINITY CHURCH$5,000
HUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY$5,000
DUTCHESS COUNTY 10-13 FOUNDATION INC$5,000
HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION$5,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($1.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($177k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THERAPEUTIC RIDING OF TUCSON: $20k → 15%ADVOCATES FOR HEALTH: $10k → 11%POP WARNER LITTLE SCHOLARS INC: $5k → 6%TEAM RUBICON: $5k → 14%ADVOCATES FOR HEALTH: $10k → 6%13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE: $5k → 9%EQUINE RESCUE INC: $65k → 16%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $85k → 17%INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $150k → 10%POP WARNER LITTLE SCHOLARS INC: $5k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER: $4k → 14%FOCUS: $75k → 7%CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $10k → 7%THERAPEUTIC RIDING OF TUCSON: $20k → 15%BEEKMAN YOUTH FUTBOL BOOSTER CLUB: $20k → 9%EQUINE RESCUE INC: $65k → 16%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $85k → 17%THE INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $100k → 10%REBUILDING TOGETHER: $4k → 14%CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $10k → 7%BEEKMAN YOUTH FUTBOL BOOSTER CLUB: $10k → 9%FRIENDS OF CHINA EXPLORATION & RESEARCH SOCIETY: $85k → 17%THE INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $57k → 10%CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $10k → 7%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20k → 9%THE INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $50k → 10%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20k → 9%THE INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $38k → 10%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20k → 9%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20k → 9%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20k → 9%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20k → 9%TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE SOCCER CLUB INC: $25k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%DUTCHESS COUNTY 10-13 FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%DUTCHESS COUNTY 10-13 FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%DUTCHESS COUNTY 10-13 FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 9%POUGHKEEPSIE FARM PROJECT: $5k → 9%SPARROWS NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $5k → 9%HOLY TRINITY CHURCH: $5k → 9%PATHFINDER FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%DUTCHESS COUNTY 10-13 FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
SC
DC
TX

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($177k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$177k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$981k · 12 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$981k
$317k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+57%

Still filing today

58%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
    5× · 2021–2025 · $394k · revenue +15%
  • ER
    EQUINE RESCUE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $130k · revenue +2% · 44% of their budget
  • HS
    HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $167k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CHINA EXPLORATION & RESEARCH SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $85k
  • TO
    TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE SOCCER CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Dorset Equine Rescue Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate, and re-home abused, neglected and slaughter bound horses of all breads and sizes. To provide a safe, loving and rehabilitative home, including all needed medical care, to every incoming animal. Once ready for their…

Animals
2
Rescue Life Inc

The mission of rescue life is to save the lives of wild, farm, and domestic animals which include horses, pigs, donkeys, llamas, zebras, alpacas,and dogs. the mission includes providing care, shelter, and adoption services. rescue life…

Animals
3
Therapeutic Horses of Saratoga Inc

Therapeutic horses of saratoga, inc. is a not-for-profit organization supporting retired race horses in leading a peaceful, safe, and meaningful life by rescuing and retraining them for therapeutic programming.

Animals
4
Red Bucket Equine Rescue
Animals
5
Colorado Horse Rescue

Our mission is to build a better future for horses by continuously reimagining what's possible and creating a reality where safe solutions exist for every horse.

Animals
6
Therapeutic & Recreational Riding Center Inc

To provide therapeutic horseback riding, serving a wide range of disabilities.

—
7
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
8
Equine Rescue Association

The mission of equine rescue association is to bring horses and humans together in a mutual harmony and respect.

—
9
Friends for Animal Rescue Ny Inc

Friends for animal rescue ny, inc. is a nonprofit organization that furthers the interest of animals in the new york state area and improves their quality of life by supporting medical care, enrichment activities, training and…

Animals
10
Dogs in Danger Rescue Inc D/B/a East Coast Adoption Agency

A small rescue group operating in the new york area that only rescues dogs from high kill shelters and southern rescues. this means a majority of dogs admitted there are euthanized due to lack of space. we very rarely take in owner…

Animals
11
Paradise Farm Rescue and Sanctuary Inc

To save equines from dire situations, such as slaughter, rehabilitate them, and place them into loving forever homes.

Animals
12
Adams County Pet Rescue

Rescue, care, and find homes for abandoned and/or abused animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Defense; the most unlike its peers is Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $166,543 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $150,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTSGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $120,000 · OtherGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCHFRIENDS OF CHINA EXPLORATION & RESEARCH SOCIETY: $85,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CHINA EXPLORATION & RESEARCH SOCIETYHOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · OtherHOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATIONBEEKMAN YOUTH FUTBOL BOOSTER CLUB: $30,000 · Other+9 more: $62,000 · Other+9 moreINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $394,400 · HealthINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWOR…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $170,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER …EQUINE RESCUE INC: $130,000 · AnimalsEQUINE RESC…HUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY: $15,000 · AnimalsHUDSON VALL…13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsTOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE SOCCER CLUB INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $30,000 · EnvironmentDUTCHESS COUNTY 10-13 FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$648,543Health$404,400Philanthropy$170,000Animals$150,000Recreation & Sports$65,000Environment$30,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $394,400 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $170,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUINE RESCUE INC: $130,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDUTCHESS COUNTY 10-13 FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPOWER TO SAVE A LIFE INC ADVOCATES FOR HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOUGHKEEPSIE FARM PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James J McCann Charit…Community Foundations…Verizon FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …
James J McCann Charitable TrustNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James J McCann Charitable Trust · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Egcmn Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Egcmn Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Egcmn Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Egcmn Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Egcmn Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home