Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ef Harris Family Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$278k
Granted FY2018
44
Grants FY2018
12
States reached
$91k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

94% of Ef Harris Family Foundation’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Ef Harris Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 18 organizations, $278k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
’17
18
’18
5
’19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$6.0MHealth$271kEducation$153kHuman Services$121kFood & Nutrition$29kReligion$28kEnvironment$8kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2018 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k38 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$90,500
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$50,000
KARA$40,000
THE OHIO ST U FOUNDATION$20,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
THE ARK$10,000
PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST$6,000
WOODSIDE HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
OUR HOUSE OF HOPE RESCUE$5,000
THE VALARIE FUND$5,000
ANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CTR$5,000
DEBRA WEISS DANCE COMPANY$3,600
HILLEL STANFORD$2,700
BRUISED BUT NOT BROKEN$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
WV
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$871k · 29 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
18

Total granted

$871k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+63%

Still filing today

38%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    3× · 2017–2019 · $250k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2017–2019 · $221k · revenue +202% · 42% of their budget
  • K
    KARA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $121k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CB
    CASHMERE BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • JN
    JCF NORTHERN CA WILDLIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
12
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Palo Alto Community Fund; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $5,704,611 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FDJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $250,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Michigan: $220,500 · OtherUniversity…KARA: $120,750 · OtherKARATHE OHIO ST U FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherTHE OHIO S…THE VALERIE FUND: $45,000 · OtherTHE VALERI…MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $40,108 · OtherMICHIGAN S…+44 more: $87,504 · Other+44 moreANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $1,550 · Food & NutritionPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $6,000 · EnvironmentTREEPEOPLE INC: $500 · Environment+1 more: $100 · EnvironmentTHE CENTER FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE INC: $5,400 · ReligionJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $540 · ReligionNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,440 · HealthCORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC: $1,080 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $300 · HealthLasting Imprint Inc: $100 · HealthTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION: $2,160 · International
Philanthropy$5,956,611Other$613,862Food & Nutrition$26,550Environment$6,600Religion$5,940Health$2,920International$2,160

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $220,500 over 3y, 42% of budgetKARA: $120,750 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND: $45,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC: $25,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE INC: $5,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION: $2,160 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $1,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,440 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC: $1,080 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrosshatch Center for Art & Ecology: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLasting Imprint Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds KARA ↗
  • Who funds THE VALERIE FUND ↗
  • Who funds ANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEGEV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds Crosshatch Center for Art & Ecology ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ef Harris Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ef Harris Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ef Harris Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph