How much does Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc give?

Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc reported 29 grants totaling $33,750 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 46 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (47%), Environment (36%), Arts & Culture (5%).

Who are Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: New Mexico Wildlife Center Inc ($25k), Earthjustice ($16k), Natural Resources Defense Council Inc ($12k).

Does Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 10% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Santa Fe Community Foundation, Carroll Petrie Foundation, Albuquerque Community Foundation.

Where is Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc based?

Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc is based in NM.

Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc

Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$5k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$104kEnvironment$80kArts & Culture$11kReligion$10kFood & Nutrition$7kScience & Tech$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0

02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$600

Median grant

States reached

$362k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
NM WILDLIFE CENTER	$5,000
EARTH JUSTICE	$4,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL	$3,500
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY	$3,000
WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER	$2,000
AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE FUND	$1,500
NATL WILDLIFE FEDERATION	$1,500
AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY	$1,500
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE	$1,000
THE FOOD DEPOT	$1,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND	$1,000
INTL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE	$1,000
ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY	$1,000
NM WILDERNESS ALLIANCE	$1,000
BIG CAT RESCUE	$600

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$211k · 49 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$211k

$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%

+8%

Still filing today

71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsEnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NM
NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue ×15
EARTHJUSTICE
7× · 2019–2025 · $16k · revenue +66%
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
7× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +37%

Funded once

EM
ENSEMBLE MUSIC OF NM
one grant, 2019 · $1k
AP
ANIMAL PROTECTION OF NM
one grant, 2022 · $850
Earth Island Institute Incgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $750 · revenue +148%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment

Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services

American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals

Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals

National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment

The Nature Conservancy

The mission of the nature conservancy is to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends.

—

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International

For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals

Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals

Environment Now

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The Keshi Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

50/50

Grantees still filing

36/50

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$100,510Environment$56,425Animals$45,000Human Services$12,750International$5,200Education$3,250Social Science$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Carroll Petrie Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Christopher Reynolds Foundation Inc · The Frost Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edyne and Allen Gordon Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Edyne and Allen Gordon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home