· Private foundation
Edwin M Johnston Jr Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NICHOLS SCHOOL | $37,000 |
| RAINFOREST TRUST | $30,000 |
| PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS | $30,000 |
| ROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY INC | $23,000 |
| THE PARK SCHOOL | $19,779 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $15,000 |
| THE DOUG FLUTIE JR FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM INC | $15,000 |
| BLUFFTON SELF HELP INC | $15,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLUFFTON | $15,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| DUCKS UNLIMITED INC | $10,000 |
| PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CAPE COD | $10,000 |
| THE TRUSTEES | $10,000 |
| ART FOR ALL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $290k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RTROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $218k · revenue +69%
- NSNICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO3× · 2020–2025 · $79k · revenue +34%
- DUDucks Unlimited Inc3× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $72k
- WTWright Tavern Legacy Trustone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
- UUUNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
Building community; creating connections; saving wildlife through a collaboration for change: the buffalo zoo will be a center of conservation excellence, providing leadership to secure a future where wildlife thrives. we embody our…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Buffalo and Erie County and the most unlike its peers is Art for All. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY INC ↗
- Who funds NICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BISON CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ELMWOOD-FRANKLIN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO NIAGARA WATERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds BLUFFTON SELF HELP INC ↗
- Who funds BUDDY DOG HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds OARS INC ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY IN ASYLUM INC ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds Partnership With Native Americans ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DOUG FLUTIE JR FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CAPE COD INC ↗
- Who funds ASSEMBLY HOUSE 150 INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE BUFFALO INC ↗
- Who funds COTUIT CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds TABOR ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Wright Tavern Legacy Trust ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds Tommy's Place Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc · The Marks Family Foundation · The Osc Charitable Foundation · Rich Family Foundation · The Baird Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · Mulroy Family Foundation · The Spofford Foundation Inc · Children's Foundation of Erie County Inc · The Margaret L Wendt Foundation · The Western New York Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edwin M Johnston Jr Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oars Inc — 100% of income from government
- Wright Tavern Legacy Trust — 100% of income from government
- Road to Responsibility Inc — 92% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Cotuit Center for the Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.