Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwin E and Ruby C Morgan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$850k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$2.5MHousing & Shelter$2.5MCrime & Legal$930kHuman Services$818kHealth$468kFood & Nutrition$380kYouth Development$40kArts & Culture$9k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $462k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $375k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$92,000
THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION$86,235
MISSISSIPPI SPAY AND NEUTER$75,000
SO CHRISTIAN SVC FOR CHILD & YOUTH INC$72,000
STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$50,000
MS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$45,000
WINGARD HOME INC$45,000
MS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$41,000
STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$40,000
THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION$40,000
THE SALVATION ARMY METRO JACKSON COMMAND$40,000
MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK$40,000
THE MUSTARD SEED$40,000
DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES$30,000
THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $863k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $30k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 23%DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $45k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $45k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $45k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $45k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $45k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $45k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $45k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $40k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $40k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $5k → 23%WINGARD HOME INC: $5k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.6M · 15 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
0

Total granted

$7.6M
$0

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +95%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $930k · revenue +141%
  • MS
    MISSISSIPPI SPAY AND NEUTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $799k · revenue +23% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Mid Coast Hunger Prevention Program

    The mission of Mid Coast Hunger Prevention Program is to provide hungry people with access to healthy food, work to improve the quality of their lives by partnering with others, and serve them in a manner that recognizes their dignity.

    Unclassified
    2
    Meals On Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Inc

    To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.

    Food & Nutrition
    3
    Mississippi Housing Partnership

    To create a Mississippi where every family has access to safe, decent, and affordable housing.

    Housing & Shelter
    4
    Central Mississippi Civic Improvement Association Inc

    The missions is to provide quality, comprehensive primary and preventative healthcare and social services to the communities we serve. We are committed to serving the uninsured and the under insured.

    Health
    5
    Hospice of Midland Inc

    Hospice provides care from the heart to fulfill the unique needs of patients and families.

    —
    6
    Madison Area Care for the Homeless (Mach) Onehealth Inc

    Madison street medicine is on a mission to develop programming and services to fill gaps in access to healthcare and housing in the madison area. we envision a community where individuals experiencing housing insecurity have equitable…

    Health
    7
    Hospice Ministries Inc

    Hospice ministries, inc. provides social welfare, health and charitable hospice services and support to all persons throughout mississippi.

    Human Services
    8
    Mid-Land Meals Inc

    To plan, coordinate, and provide meals and nutritional services primarily for the elderly, disabled, and low-income individuals in the state of Indiana.

    —
    9
    Montgomery Hospice Inc

    To gentle the journey through serious illness and loss with skill and compassion. to bring comfort by providing compassionate, professional care to community residents who are facing serious illness and loss. to provide dignity for the…

    Human Services
    10
    Mississippi Society for Disabilities Incorporated

    To provide a broad spectrum of programs and program services to meet the needs of mississippi children and adults with disabilities, thus enabling them to achieve maximum independence and gain the greatest quility of life.

    —
    11
    Housing Services of Mid Michigan

    To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

    Housing & Shelter
    12
    Mother Teresa Hospice Inc

    Provide health care services to qualified patients who have been determined to be in the later stages of life.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Food Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mississippi Spay and Neuter (Span). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    3
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    8/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    MS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE: $1,671,019 · OtherMS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUESTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,280,000 · OtherSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INCSO CHRISTIAN SVC FOR CHILD & YOUTH INC: $586,000 · OtherSO CHRISTIAN SVC FOR CHILD & YOUTH INCThe Mustard Seed Inc: $360,000 · OtherThe Mustard Seed IncTHE SALVATION ARMY METRO JACKSON COMMAND: $360,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY METRO JACKSON COMMANDTHE HOME PLACE: $220,000 · Other+2 more: $27,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $929,691 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PRE…DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $457,520 · Human ServicesDELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT S…WINGARD HOME INC: $405,000 · Human ServicesWINGARD HOME INC+1 more: $36,000 · Human ServicesMISSISSIPPI SPAY AND NEUTER (SPAN): $798,500 · AnimalsMISSISSIPPI…MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $380,000 · Food & NutritionMONTAGE HEALTH: $54,000 · Health
    Other$4,504,019Human Services$1,828,211Animals$798,500Food & Nutrition$380,000Health$54,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,280,000 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $929,691 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetMISSISSIPPI SPAY AND NEUTER (SPAN): $798,500 over 9y, 26% of budgetDELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $457,520 over 9y, 35% of budgetWINGARD HOME INC: $405,000 over 9y, 26% of budgetMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $380,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetThe Mustard Seed Inc: $360,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetMONTAGE HEALTH: $54,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC ↗
    • Who funds MISSISSIPPI SPAY AND NEUTER (SPAN) ↗
    • Who funds DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds WINGARD HOME INC ↗
    • Who funds MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC ↗
    • Who funds The Mustard Seed Inc ↗
    • Who funds MONTAGE HEALTH ↗
    • Who funds HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Ergon Foundation IncMS15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Ergon Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Edwin E and Ruby C Morgan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin E and Ruby C Morgan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Edwin E and Ruby C Morgan’s filings →

      More from the funding graph