· Private foundation
Edwin E and Ruby C Morgan Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of EDWIN E AND RUBY C MORGAN FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $462k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $375k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE | $92,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION | $86,235 |
| MISSISSIPPI SPAY AND NEUTER | $75,000 |
| SO CHRISTIAN SVC FOR CHILD & YOUTH INC | $72,000 |
| STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $50,000 |
| MS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE | $45,000 |
| WINGARD HOME INC | $45,000 |
| MS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE | $41,000 |
| STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $40,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION | $40,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY METRO JACKSON COMMAND | $40,000 |
| MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK | $40,000 |
| THE MUSTARD SEED | $40,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION | $30,000 |
| MS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $863k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +95%
- TCTHE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $930k · revenue +141%
- MSMISSISSIPPI SPAY AND NEUTER9× · 2017–2025 · $799k · revenue +23% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Mid Coast Hunger Prevention Program is to provide hungry people with access to healthy food, work to improve the quality of their lives by partnering with others, and serve them in a manner that recognizes their dignity.
To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.
To create a Mississippi where every family has access to safe, decent, and affordable housing.
The missions is to provide quality, comprehensive primary and preventative healthcare and social services to the communities we serve. We are committed to serving the uninsured and the under insured.
Hospice provides care from the heart to fulfill the unique needs of patients and families.
Madison street medicine is on a mission to develop programming and services to fill gaps in access to healthcare and housing in the madison area. we envision a community where individuals experiencing housing insecurity have equitable…
Hospice ministries, inc. provides social welfare, health and charitable hospice services and support to all persons throughout mississippi.
To plan, coordinate, and provide meals and nutritional services primarily for the elderly, disabled, and low-income individuals in the state of Indiana.
To gentle the journey through serious illness and loss with skill and compassion. to bring comfort by providing compassionate, professional care to community residents who are facing serious illness and loss. to provide dignity for the…
To provide a broad spectrum of programs and program services to meet the needs of mississippi children and adults with disabilities, thus enabling them to achieve maximum independence and gain the greatest quility of life.
To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing
Provide health care services to qualified patients who have been determined to be in the later stages of life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Food Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mississippi Spay and Neuter (Span). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI SPAY AND NEUTER (SPAN) ↗
- Who funds DELIVER ME SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WINGARD HOME INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds The Mustard Seed Inc ↗
- Who funds MONTAGE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ergon Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edwin E and Ruby C Morgan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.