Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwin and Kathryn Clarke Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$160kEducation$66kFood & Nutrition$55kHuman Services$43kRecreation & Sports$14kHousing & Shelter$13kInternational$8kReligion$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$669k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra$10,000
University of Pittsburgh$5,000
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank$5,000
The Salvation Army$4,000
412 Food Rescue$3,250
Timeline Theatre Company$3,000
Refugee One$2,500
Bethlehem Haven$2,000
The Neighborhood Academy$2,000
Family Resources$2,000
Sewickley Valley Community Fund$2,000
Acorn Theater$2,000
Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy$1,500
Holy Family Foundation$1,000
Grow Pittsburgh$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Bethlehem Haven: $2k → 11%Bethlehem Haven: $2k → 11%Family Resources: $2k → 11%Bethlehem Haven: $2k → 11%Family Resources: $2k → 11%Family Resources: $2k → 11%Bethlehem Haven: $2k → 11%Family Resources: $2k → 11%Family Resources: $2k → 11%Bethlehem Haven: $2k → 11%Bethlehem Haven: $2k → 11%Family Resources: $2k → 11%Bethlehem Haven: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$370k · 26 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$370k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

88%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $82k · revenue +51%
  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +76%
  • PO
    PITTSBURGH OPERA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE PITTSBURGH FISHER HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +151%
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • RI
    Rescue Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
3
Pittsburgh Entertainment Project

To create a vibrant, responsible, and sustainable film and digital media sector in southwestern pennsylvania.

—
4
Pittsburgh Public Theater Corporation

The mission of pittsburgh public theater is to provide artistically diverse theatrical experiences of the highest quality. pittsburgh public theater also strives to serve, challenge, stimulate, and (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
5
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
6
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
7
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
8
Rebuilding Together Pittsburgh

Working in partnership with low-income elderly homeowners, veterans, and individuals with disabilities, their families, volunteers and community residents, we work to preserve and revitalize houses thus providing a community impact.…

Housing & Shelter
9
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
10
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
11
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
12
Greater Pittsburgh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

Tourism development organization dedicated to expanding the tourism economy across allegheny county.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grandanse Health & Development Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $82,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INCPITTSBURGH OPERA INC: $23,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH OPERA INCTIMELINE THEATRE COMPANY: $18,000 · Arts & CultureTIMELINE THEATRE COMPANYPITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC: $12,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INCThe City Theatre Company Inc: $7,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $5,250 · Arts & CultureThe Salvation Army: $27,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyHOPE IGNITES PITTSBURGH: $24,500 · OtherHOPE IGNITES PITTSBURGHAcorn Theater: $13,000 · OtherAcorn TheaterHOLY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY FOUNDATIONREFUGEEONE: $8,000 · OtherREFUGEEONE+8 more: $16,500 · Other+8 moreGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $35,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER PITTSBU…412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $11,250 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD RESCUE…GROW PITTSBURGH: $7,000 · Food & NutritionGROW PITTSBURGHUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $12,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…Sewickley Public Library: $8,500 · EducationSewickley…THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $6,500 · EducationTHE NEIGH…WARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $4,500 · EducationWARREN WI…BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $13,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCES: $12,000 · Human ServicesPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $13,500 · Recreation & SportsRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsGRANDANSE HEALTH & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$147,250Other$96,000Food & Nutrition$53,250Education$31,500Human Services$25,000Recreation & Sports$16,500Health$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $82,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IGNITES PITTSBURGH: $24,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPITTSBURGH OPERA INC: $23,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTIMELINE THEATRE COMPANY: $18,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $13,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $13,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $11,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSewickley Public Library: $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe City Theatre Company Inc: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGROW PITTSBURGH: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGRANDANSE HEALTH & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEWICKLEY CEMETERY FOUNDATION: $4,250 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PITTSBURGH FISHER HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSewickley Valley Community Fund: $2,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetVILLAGE THEATER COMPANY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds TIMELINE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds 412 FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sewickley Public Library ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEEONE ↗
  • Who funds The City Theatre Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GROW PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GRANDANSE HEALTH & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WARREN WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SEWICKLEY CEMETERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PITTSBURGH FISHER HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds Sewickley Valley Community Fund ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE THEATER COMPANY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA26.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Peirce Family Foundation Inc · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Wi Patterson Charitable Fund · Allegheny Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Burke Family Foundation · The Burke Foundation · The Fine Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwin and Kathryn Clarke Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin and Kathryn Clarke Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwin and Kathryn Clarke Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph