Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwin and Jeanette May Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$213k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$2.1MAnimals$1.0MInternational$675kHuman Services$608kReligion$550kHealth$350kPhilanthropy$260kCommunity Improvement$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.1M
$100,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$212,500
CANINES FOR SERVICE$200,000
WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION$200,000
OPERATION LIGHT SHINE$150,000
CAPE FEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE$100,000
HOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING$75,000
A21 CAMPAIGN INC$75,000
AWAKE$50,000
READING IS FUNDAMENTAL$40,000
GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CANINES FOR SERVICE: $200k → 12%CANINES FOR SERVICE: $200k → 12%CANINES FOR SERVICE: $200k → 12%CANINES FOR SERVICE: $200k → 12%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $100k → 10%CANINES FOR SERVICE: $150k → 12%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
CT
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 13 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$5.2M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

62%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Canines for Service Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $950k · revenue +89%
  • LC
    LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $848k · revenue +59%
  • HA
    HOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING
    5× · 2021–2025 · $408k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • LC
    LUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • SB
    ST BERNADETTE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
  • FT
    FIRST THINGS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $185k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
2
Animal Angels
—
3
Soar Foundation
Unclassified
4
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
5
Live Free Animal Rescue

To rescue abandoned, neglected and traumatized animals and find these animals their furever homes.

Animals
6
Healing Paws for Warriors Inc

Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…

Human Services
7
Fallen Soldiers March

Providing highly trained service dogs for wounded united states military veterans in need of assistance

—
8
Paws 4 Liberty Inc

Raising and training service dogs for disabled military vets.

Human Services
9
Lolas Rescue

Industry leading non-profit concentrating on saving the lives of unwanted, abused and abandoned cats and dogs from the local community and overcrowded shelters from across the country, while upholding best practices and the highest of…

Animals
10
No Dogs Left Behind
Animals
11
Operation Adopt a Soldier

Helping wounded soldiers

Public Benefit
12
Dogs for Life Inc

The corporation's mission is to improve the quality of life for people and dogs through training assistance dogs, pet therapy dogs, and owning and operating an off-leash dog park. the corporation also assists with enhancing the quality of…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tim Tebow Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Soar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $562,500 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGEA21 CAMPAIGN INC: $390,000 · OtherA21 CAMPAIGN INCCAPE FEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $325,000 · OtherCAPE FEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGELUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER: $250,000 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE REDEEMERLORENZO WALKER TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $225,000 · OtherLORENZO WALKER TECHNICAL COLLEGEST BERNADETTE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $200,000 · OtherST BERNADETTE CATHOLIC CHURCHFIRST THINGS FOUNDATION INC: $185,300 · OtherFIRST THINGS FOUNDATION INCOPERATION LIGHT SHINE: $150,000 · OtherOPERATION LIGHT SHINEAWAKE: $100,000 · Other+4 more: $155,000 · Other+4 moreCanines for Service Inc: $950,000 · Human ServicesCanines for Service IncHOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING: $408,000 · Human ServicesHOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKINGGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $200,000 · Human ServicesGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs…LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC: $848,000 · EducationLEES-MCRAE COLLE…LACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $40,000 · EducationFIRST THINGS FOUNDATION INC: $340,300 · InternationalFIRST THIN…WINGS OF SHELTER INT'L INC: $235,000 · InternationalWINGS OF S…WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 · HealthWARRIOR HE…SOAR: $225,000 · HealthSOARSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100,000 · ReligionTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,542,800Human Services$1,558,000Education$938,000International$575,300Health$575,000Religion$100,000Philanthropy$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCanines for Service Inc: $950,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC: $848,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetHOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING: $408,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetWARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetFIRST THINGS FOUNDATION INC: $340,300 over 3y, 39% of budgetWINGS OF SHELTER INT'L INC: $235,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADOPT AN ANGEL: $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Canines for Service Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST THINGS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF SHELTER INT'L INC ↗
  • Who funds SOAR ↗
  • Who funds Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION LIGHT SHINE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT AN ANGEL ↗
  • Who funds LACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwin and Jeanette May Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin and Jeanette May Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwin and Jeanette May’s filings →

    More from the funding graph