Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwards Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$637k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.7MPublic Benefit$1.6MCrime & Legal$1.5MHealth$1.4MSocial Science$85kHuman Services$83kYouth Development$74kRecreation & Sports$62kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $450k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEDARS SINAI$200,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$100,000
HOOVER INSTITUTION$100,000
THE GLADSTONE INSTITUTE$50,000
HIGHER GROUND USA$15,000
WOODSIDE PRIORY SCHOOL$15,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY-STANFORD LIVE$14,400
THE KELSEY PROJECT$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$10,000
LOS GATOS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
LOS CABOS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$10,000
AIM HIGH$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$10,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOS CABOS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%PEACEFUL WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $3k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%REFUGEE RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
PA
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 41 repeat orgs$783k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
32

Total granted

$5.2M
$752k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+0%

Still filing today

61%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +304%
  • PL
    Pacific Legal Foundation
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +136%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $410k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CO
    Cause of Action Institute
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue -92%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • HI
    HOOVER INSTITUTION-SUPPORT VDH
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
2
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
5
Northern California Institute for Research and Education Inc

To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.

Health
6
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
7
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
University of Redlands

We welcome, educate, and empower a diverse community of learners for lives of meaning, impact, and joy.

Education
10
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Pacific Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is 2722 Bancroft Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
33/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TURNING POINT USA INC: $1,450,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCINDEPENDENT INSTITUTE-COEE: $220,000 · OtherINDEPENDENT INSTITUTE-COEEUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherHOOVER INSTITUTION-SUPPORT VDH: $100,000 · Other+38 more: $675,760 · Other+38 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $410,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL …THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES: $358,209 · HealthTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE…NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $250,000 · HealthNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANC…Augies Quest to Cure ALS Inc: $170,000 · HealthAugies Quest to Cure …+6 more: $86,000 · Health+6 morePacific Legal Foundation: $1,256,765 · Crime & LegalPacific Legal Foundat…+1 more: $5,000 · Crime & LegalTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $710,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUST…PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $110,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY …WOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $106,336 · EducationWOODSIDE SCHOOL FO…+11 more: $152,959 · Education+11 moreCause of Action Institute: $250,000 · Civil RightsCalMatters: $50,000 · Civil RightsAIM HIGH: $50,000 · Human ServicesPEACEFUL WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesREFUGEE RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesLos Cabos Children's Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesLITTLE WISHES: $5,000 · Human ServicesHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $34,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTHSTAR TEAM FOUNDATION: $17,000 · Recreation & SportsNORCAL CREW: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,645,760Health$1,274,209Crime & Legal$1,261,765Education$1,079,295Civil Rights$300,000Human Services$92,500Recreation & Sports$56,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,450,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $1,256,765 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $710,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $410,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES: $358,209 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCause of Action Institute: $250,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc: $170,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $106,336 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetKATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL: $52,870 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $52,262 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAIM HIGH: $50,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetNEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCalMatters: $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $34,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $30,459 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNEVADA OBSTETRICAL CHARITY CLINICS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND J FISHER HOME AND SCHOOL CLUB INC: $20,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetTHE BAY SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEGASUS SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHSTAR TEAM FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA VERDE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetREFUGEE RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLos Cabos Children's Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $7,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAUI POLICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Life Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORCAL CREW: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Religions: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE WISHES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget2722 BANCROFT FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cause of Action Institute ↗
  • Who funds Augies Quest to Cure ALS Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds AIM HIGH ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CalMatters ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA OBSTETRICAL CHARITY CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND J FISHER HOME AND SCHOOL CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BAY SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds THE PEGASUS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR TEAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY18.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Wm Keck Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Daffy Charitable Fund · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwards Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwards Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edwards Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Edwards Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edwards’ filings →

More from the funding graph